Nat'l Union Fire Ins. v. Helfand, 114 S. Ct. 84 (1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Union Fire Ins. v. Helfand, 114 S. Ct. 84 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a law will not be interpreted in such a way as to make it meaningless”
127 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 49 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Langham v. State (alacrimapp, 1994-05-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Langham v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1994 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a law will not be interpreted in such a way as to make it meaningless
cited Cited "see" Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb Co.
4th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1131 (1st Cir.) (Torraella, J.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 824 , 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993).
cited Cited "see" Eugene Duvall Patricia Sue Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb Company, a Delaware Corporation Medical Engineering Corporation, A/K/A Surgitek/medical Engineering Corporation, and Food & Drug Administration, Amicus Curiae. Eugene Duvall Patricia Sue Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb Company, a Delaware Corporation Medical Engineering Corporation, A/K/A Surgitek/medical Engineering Corporation
4th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1131 (1st Cir.) (Torruella, J.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 824 , 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" Wilson v. Bradlees
D.N.H. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
Mendes, 18 F.3d at 16 ; see Levesgue v. Miles, Inc., 816 F. Supp. 61, 64 (D.N.H. 1993) (when faced with express preemption, "the only remaining question is whether a particular state statute [or cause of 1The court's finding of express preemption forecloses inquiry into implied preemption "because the fact that Congress included it in the [statute] implies that matters beyond its reach are not preempted." Levesgue, 816 F. Supp. at 68 (quoting King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1134 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, 114 S. Ct. 84 (1993)). 7 action] intrudes into the federal pale").
cited Cited "see" Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb
4th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1131 (1st Cir.) (Torruella, J.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993).
cited Cited "see" Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb Co.
4th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1131 (1st Cir.) (Torraella, J.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993).
cited Cited "see" Estate of LeMay Ex Rel. LeMay v. Eli Lilly & Co.
E.D. Wis. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1134 (1st Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993); Stamps v. Collagen Corp., 984 F.2d at 1421-22 .
discussed Cited "see" Nina Michael v. Shiley, Inc. Hospital Products Group, Inc., (Formerly Howmedica, Inc.) Pfizer, Inc (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1135 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993).
cited Cited "see" Michael v. Shiley, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1135 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 84 (1993).
cited Cited "see" prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,061 National Bank of Commerce of El Dorado, as Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Armon Wilson, Deceased v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1135-36 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993). 41 FDA has classified menstrual tampons as Class II medical devices.
cited Cited "see" National Bank of Commerce ex rel. Estate of Wilson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1135-36 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" Bravman v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130 (1st Cir.) (“King ”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993); Stamps v. Collagen Corp., 984 F.2d 1416 (5th Cir.) {“Stamps”), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 86 (1993).
cited Cited "see" New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'n v. Town of Plaistow
D.N.H. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130 (1st Cir.1993) (express preemption provisions foreclose inquiry into implied preemption), ce rt. denied — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mears v. Marshall
Or. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Bard, Inc., 865 F Supp 37, 45 (D Mass 1994), affd 63 F3d 25 (1st Cir 1995) (citing four federal circuit court cases and four federal district court cases so holding); see also King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F2d 1130, 1140 (1st Cir), cert den [510] US [824], 114 S Ct 84 , 126 L Ed 2d 52 (1993) (no implied right of action).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Worthy v. Collagen Corp. (2×)
Tex. App. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1139 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993) (when statute is clear, agency interpretation must give way); Talbott v. C.R.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." 28 Ucc rep.serv.2d 531, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,411 Ada M. Martin Harold L. Martin v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.
6th Cir. · 1995 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1135 (1st Cir.) (holding express warranty claims preempted), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993) and Duvall, 65 F.3d at 400-01 (holding express warranty claims based on FDA-mandated labeling, packaging, or advertising preempted) with Michael v. Shiley, Inc., 46 F.3d 1316, 1327 (3rd Cir.) (holding express warranty claims not preempted), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 67 , 133 L.Ed.2d 29 (1995) and Mitchell, 67 F.3d at 1284-85 (following Michael).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Mastrangelo v. Howmedica
E.D.N.Y · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id. § 808.1(b); see also King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1134 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mears v. Marshall
Or. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Bard, Inc., 865 F Supp 37, 45 (D Mass 1994), aff’d 63 F3d 25 (1st Cir 1995) (citing four federal circuit court cases and four federal district court cases so holding); see also King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F2d 1130, 1140 (1st Cir), cert den_US_, 114 S Ct 84 , 126 L Ed 2d 52 (1993) (no implied right of action). *395 The FDA, upon recommendation of its Surgical and Rehabilitation Devices Panel, approved Collagen’s PMA application for Zyderm by letter on July 22, 1981, and by order published on September 18, 1991. 46 Fed Reg 46,394 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Committee of Dental Amalgam Alloy Manufacturers v. Henry
S.D. Cal. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Stamps v. Collagen Corp., 984 F.2d 1416, 1421 (5th Cir.) (premarket approval procedure, applicable to all Class III devices, preempts state tort claims for defective design, inadequate warning and negligent failure to warn), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 86 , 126 L.Ed.2d 54 (1993); see also King v. Collagen Corp., 983 F.2d 1130, 1134-35 (1st Cir.1993) (approval of device’s labelling and packaging during Class III premarket approval process preempts state tort claims), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 84 , 126 L.Ed.2d 52 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
Leonard HELFAND, et ux.
No. 92-1974.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
114 S. Ct. 84
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 86%
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of A… (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.