Webb v. Env't Prot. Agency, 513 U.S. 1156 (1995). · Go Syfert
Webb v. Env't Prot. Agency, 513 U.S. 1156 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2000 · 2 courts · …any break in the chain of custody goes to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility ⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 · …any prejudice created by a joint trial can generally be cured through careful jury instructions. ⚠ not in text
108 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Premier Capital, Inc. v. Grossman, No. Cv99 0334654 S (Nov. 22, 2000) (connsuperct, 2000-11-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Premier Capital, Inc. v. Grossman, No. Cv99 0334654 S (Nov. 22, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
any break in the chain of custody goes to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.
Conn. · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
any break in the chain of custody goes to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Sylvester Tolliver, Gerald Elwood, Danielle Bernard Metz, Gennero Arthur, Noah Moore, Jr., Marlo Helmstetter, Glenn Metz, and Shane Sterling, United States of America v. Noah Moore, Jr.
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
any prejudice created by a joint trial can generally be cured through careful jury instructions.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Moore
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
any prejudice created by a joint trial can generally be cured through careful jury instructions.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) UNITED STATES of AMERICA v. PAULIN SANCHEZ-ROCHA
unknown court · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
e caution counsel to state specifically in the opening brief the issues raised on appeal; the failure to do so will usually result in our not considering them.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Greathouse
La. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Jones, 56 F.3d 581 , 583 n. 4 (5th Cir.1995) Unless or until the co-defendant’s case is severed from the defendant’s, “the excludable delay of one codefendant may be attributed to all defendants.” United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1567 (5th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995) [emphasis by the court]; see also State v. Thomas, 10-0528, 10-0529, 10-0303 (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/15/10) , 54 So.3d 1 . | uThe judgment of the trial court is vacated and this ease is remanded to the trial court with instructions to determine the issues r…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Prentice
D. Minnesota · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Rabinowitz, 56 F.3d 932, 933 (8th Cir.1995) (“The risk of a nonunanimous jury verdict inherent in a duplicitous count may be cured by a limiting instruction.”), citing United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1286 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995); see also, United States v. Pierce, 479 F.3d 546, 552 (8th Cir.2007).
cited Cited "see" United States v. William T. Carter
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1285 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Damon Beaman
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
The prosecutor complied with that ruling and thus did no more “than argue permissible inferences from the evidence.” United States v. Beckman, 222 F.3d 512, 527 (8th Cir.2000); see United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1289 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Frenklyn Piggie (2×)
8th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1285 (8th Cir.1994) (citing United States v. Kenyon, 7 F.3d 783, 786 (8th Cir.1993)), cert. denied, El Hani v. United States, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Keith J. Gatlin
8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1285 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1113 (1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Keith J. Gatlin
8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1285 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113 (1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Wanambisi
5th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1575 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Dyer v. Woods
5th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1577 (1994) (holding that the Sentencing Guidelines apply to conspiracies continuing past their effective date), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113 (1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Marcel Samuel Lambert
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1285 (8th Cir.1994) (standard of review), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1113 (1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Marcel Lambert
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1285 (8th Cir. 1994) (standard of review), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" Central SEC. and Alarm Co., Inc. v. Mehler
N.M. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1574 (5th Cir.1994) (gap in chain of custody affects weight, not admissibility), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 , and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1825 , 131 L.Ed.2d 746 (1995); Matador Drilling Co. v. Post, 662 F.2d 1190, 1199 (5th Cir.1981) (questions of completeness and accuracy affect weight, not admissibility); United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499, 511 (2d Cir.) (business records admissible despite impeachment for accuracy and completeness), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1009 , 93 S.Ct. 443 , 34 L.Ed.2d 302 (1972);…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kelly James Anderson
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1285-86 (8th Cir.1994) ("relevant conduct" may include conduct from dismissed counts), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1113 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Tolliver
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1572 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995) ("Any prejudice created by a joint trial can generally be cured through careful jury instructions.”). 8 . 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031-5042 . 9 .
cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIE LELAND McQUEEN, also known as Will, and ORLANDO TYRE AUSTIN, also known as Lance
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1551 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113 (1995); United States v. El-Zoubi, 993 F.2d 442, 445 (5th Cir. 1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Thomas J. McCarthy
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1284 (8th Cir.1994) (departure pursuant to § 3553(e)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995); United States v. Left Hand Bull, 901 F.2d 647, 650 (8th Cir.1990) (departure pursuant to USSG § 5K2.10).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Thomas Joseph McCarthy United States of America v. Clarence William Houston, Also Known as C.W. Houston, United States of America v. John Walter Piner, United States of America v. Carl Luverne Thompsen, United States of America v. Michael Arney Ness, United States of America v. Stephen Lloyd Labrie
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1284 (8th Cir.1994) (departure pursuant to § 3553(e)), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1156 , 115 S.Ct. 1113 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1995); United States v. Left Hand Bull, 901 F.2d 647, 650 (8th Cir.1990) (departure pursuant to USSG § 5K2.10).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Kenneth Blankenship
8th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Duranseau, 26 F.3d 804, 808 (8th Cir.) (citing Koory, 20 F.3d at 847 ), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 341 , 130 L.Ed.2d 298 (1994); see also United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1566 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. - and — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1113 and 115 S.Ct. 1825 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1077 and 131 L.Ed.2d 746 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." DARILE JOHNSON v. RAYMOND ROBERTS and MIKE MOORE
unknown court · signal: see also · confidence low
“In determining whether a delay of a prisoner’s appeal violates due process, this court looks to the factors set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972).” Bailey v. Scott, No. 94-10917, at 3 (5th Cir. May 24, 1995) (unpublished); see also United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1568-69 (5th Cir. 1994) (citing Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 302-04 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 (1981)), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113 , and cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1824 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Webb
v.
Environmental Protection Agency
No. 94-1260.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1995.
513 U.S. 1156

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.