green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Beckwith v. Anderson
See Beckwith II, 707 So.2d at 566 . (b) reason for the delay In Cowart v. Hargett, 16 F.3d 642, 647 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 886 , 115 S.Ct. 227 , 130 L.Ed.2d 153 (1994), the Fifth Circuit considered issues that must be analyzed under the “reason for delay” Barker factor.
discussed
Cited "see"
Salazar v. State
(2×)
See Paxton v. State, 1993 OK CR 59 , 867 P.2d 1309, 1330 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 886 , 115 S.Ct. 227 , 130 L.Ed.2d 153 (1994). ¶ 32 Salazar submits next that the prosecutor misstated the law by arguing that Salazar's good conduct in prison was not relevant to whether he constituted a continuing threat to society.
cited
Cited "see"
Matthews v. State
See Paxton v. State, 867 P.2d 1309, 1323 (Okl.Cr. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 886 , 115 S.Ct. 227 , 130 L.Ed.2d 153 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Riselay v. United States
See United States v. Riselay, Nos. 93-1763/1884, 1994 WL 175770 (6th Cir. May 9, 1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 227 and 349 (1994). 3 In his motion to vacate, Riselay presented three grounds for relief: (1) his sentence was improperly enhanced because the notice under § 851 was defective; (2) the government breached an oral understanding underlying the plea agreement; and (3) counsel rendered ineffective assistance at the pretrial, plea negotiation, and sentencing stages.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cervantes
See Cowart v. Hargett, 16 F.3d 642 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 227 , 130 L.Ed.2d 153 (1994); United States v. Russo, 796 F.2d 1443, 1452 (11th Cir.1986); United States v. Anderson, 902 F.2d 1105, 1110 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 867 , 111 S.Ct. 182 , 112 L.Ed.2d 146 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. State
(2×)
See Bible, 858 P.2d at 1183 ("[N]ot withstanding legitimate criticism of Frye , ... this is not the case to determine whether Arizona should follow Daubert. " See also Fish back, 851 P.2d at 890 (DNA testing "is precisely the sort of scientific evidence which requires application of the Frye test."). [34] See Paxton v. State, 867 P.2d 1309, 1323, n. 3 (Okl.Cr. 1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 227 , 130 L.Ed.2d 153 (1994); Yell, 856 P.2d at 996 ; Davenport, 806 P.2d at 661 ; Moore, 788 P.2d at 398 ; Driskell, 659 P.2d at 356 ; Henderson, 230 P.2d at 502 . [35] See e.g.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cenido
See also Cowart v. Hargett, 16 F.3d 642, 645 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 886 , 115 S.Ct. 227 , 130 L.Ed.2d 153 (1994) (“A defendant’s speedy trial rights attach only when he is formally charged with a crime or actually restrained in connection with that crime” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Van Woudenberg v. State
(2×)
See also Paxton v. State, 867 P.2d 1309, 1318 (Okl.Cr.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 886 , 115 S.Ct. 227 , 130 L.Ed.2d 153 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Naddi
v.
California
v.
California
No. 94-5133.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.