green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
“he constitution forbids striking even a single prospective juror for a discriminatory purpose”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Cheatteam
he constitution forbids striking even a single prospective juror for a discriminatory purpose
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Trevino
(McCain v. Gramley (7th Cir. 1996) 96 F.3d 288, 292 ; see U.S. v. Vasquez-Lopez (9th Cir. 1994) 22 F.3d 900, 902 , cert. den. 14 U.S. 891 [ 115 S.Ct. 239 , 130 L.Ed.2d 162 ].) 6 When reviewing Batson challenges, federal courts have also found it significant that a party is willing to accept jurors from the group allegedly discriminated against.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Perkins
"A witness may be cross-examined on any matter relevant to any issue in the case, including credibility." N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 611(b) (1992); accord State v. Lee, 335 N.C. 244, 271 , 439 S.E.2d 547, 560 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 239 , 130 L.Ed.2d 162 (1994); see 1 Kenneth S. Broun, Brandis and Broun on North Carolina Evidence § 154 (4th ed. 1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Todd JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arb CAMPBELL; Charles Gross; City of Newport Beach; Donald Strauss, Defendants-Appellees
See United States v. Vasquez-Lopez, 22 F.3d 900, 901-902 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 239 , 130 L.Ed.2d 162 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. White
See State v. Lee, 335 N.C. 244, 266-67 , 439 S.E.2d 547, 558 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 239 , 130 L.Ed.2d 162 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bergodere
See United States v. Vasquez-Lopez, 22 F.3d 900 , 901 ___ ______________ _____________ (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 239 (1994); United States v. _____ ______ _____________ 7 Branch, 989 F.2d 752, 755 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. ______ _____ ______ 3060 (1993); United States v. Casper, 956 F.2d 416, 418 (3d Cir. _____________ ______ 1992); United States v. Moore, 895 F.2d 484, 485 (8th Cir. 1990); _____________ _____ United States v. Grandison, 885 F.2d 143, 146 (4th Cir. 1989), _____________ _________ cert. denied, 495 U.S. 934 (1990). _____ ______ C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bergodere
See United States v. Vasquez-Lopez, 22 F.3d 900, 901 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 239 , 130 L.Ed.2d 162 (1994); United States v. Branch, 989 F.2d 752, 755 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 3060 , 125 L.Ed.2d 742 (1993); United States v. Casper, 956 F.2d 416, 418 (3d Cir.1992); United States v. Moore, 895 F.2d 484, 485 (8th Cir.1990); United States v. Grandison, 885 F.2d 143, 146 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 934 , 110 S.Ct. 2178 , 109 L.Ed.2d 507 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Perez
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 20 F.3d 125 , 129 n. 2 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 891 , 115 S.Ct. 239 , 130 L.Ed.2d 162 (1994) (holding it was not error for the trial court to have employed a modified version of the FJC instruction, but urging that trial courts use the Fifth Circuit’s Pattern Jury Instruction instead); United States v. Hunt, 794 F.2d 1095, 1100 (5th Cir.1986) (finding no error in the district court’s use of a modified version of the FJC instruction, but instead encouraging the lower courts to use the Fifth Circuit’s Pattern Jury Instruction); McBride, 786 F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miguel A. Ramirez v. Sherman Hatcher, Warden
(2×)
See, e.g., Monk v. Zelez, 901.F.2d 885, 889-90 (10th Cir.1990) (holding unconstitutional an instruction that defined reasonable doubt as “substantial” doubt and used “willing to act” language); United States v. Jensen, 561 F.2d 1297, 1300-01 (8th Cir.1977) (stating that instruction was “defective” because it failed to use “hesitate to act” language, but declining to reverse conviction because issue was not raised on appeal); Scurry v. United States, 347 F.2d 468, 470 (D.C.Cir.1965) (stating that instruction “den[ied] the defendant the benefit of a reasonable doubt” in stati…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brand
See United States v. Velasquez, 980 F.2d 1275, 1278 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 , 113 S.Ct. 2979 , 125 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993) (upholding same pattern instruction used here); United States v. Hunt, 794 F.2d 1095, 1100-1101 (5th Cir.1986) ("firmly convinced” adequately conveys "beyond a reasonable doubt” standard); United States v. Taylor, 997 F.2d 1551, 1557 (D.C.Cir.1993) (same); see also United States v. Williams, 20 F.3d 125, 131 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 239 , 130 L.Ed.2d 162 (1994); United States v. Barrera-Gonzales, 952 F.2d 1269, 1272-73 (10th Cir.1992)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McGuire
v.
Farley, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison
v.
Farley, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison
No. 94-5236.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: Louisiana Court of Appeal (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.