Harper v. Mujahid, 513 U.S. 914 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Harper v. Mujahid, 513 U.S. 914 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“it is the insured's initial discharge, however, not the resulting damage or pollution, that is the focus of the inquiry under the pollution exclusion clauses.”
44 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co. (delsuperct, 1995-08-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.
Del. Super. Ct. · 1995 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it is the insured's initial discharge, however, not the resulting damage or pollution, that is the focus of the inquiry under the pollution exclusion clauses.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sweeney
D. Mass. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sweeney v. Resolution Trust Corp., 16 F.3d 1, 2-3 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 914 , 115 S.Ct. 291 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994) (holding that removal to federal district court was proper and affirming the district court judgment against Sweeneys).
discussed Cited "see" LaFarge Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
M.D. Fla. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Texas Transmission Corporation PCB Contamination Insurance Coverage Litigation, 870 F.Supp. 1293 (E.D.Pa.1992), affirmed, 995 F.2d 219 (3rd Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 291 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994); American States Ins.
discussed Cited "see" Ferreira v. Federal Deposit Insurance
D. Mass. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sweeney v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 16 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 291 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994) (denying request to prevent RTC 5 from foreclosing on property secured by note owned by failed institution); Telematics International, Inc. v. NEMLC Leasing Corporation, 967 F.2d at 706 (section 1821(j) prevents district court from enjoining FDIC from foreclosing on property secured by certificate of deposit issued to failed bank); Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 938 F.2d 383, 397-398 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 60…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harper
v.
Mujahid, aka Smith
No. 94-43.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
513 U.S. 914
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: Superior Court of Delaware (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.