green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose v. Johnson
See Williams v. Collins, 16 F.3d 626, 637 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1289 , 115 S.Ct. 42 , 129 L.Ed.2d 937 (1994); McKay v. Collins, 12 F.3d 66, 68 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 854 , 115 S.Ct. 157 , 130 L.Ed.2d 95 (1994); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 229 (5th Cir.1993); Uresti v. Lynaugh, 821 F.2d 1099, 1102 (5th Cir. 1987); Millard v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 1403, 1407 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 838 , 108 S.Ct. 122 , 98 L.Ed.2d 81 (1987); Liner v. Phelps, 731 F.2d 1201, 1203 (5th Cir. 1984); Branch v. Estelle, 631 F.2d 1229, 1233 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose v. Johnson
See Williams v. Collins, 16 F.3d 626, 637 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1289 , 115 S.Ct. 42 , 129 L.Ed.2d 937 (1994); McKay v. Collins, 12 F.3d 66, 68 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 854 , 115 S.Ct. 157 , 130 L.Ed.2d 95 (1994); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 229 (5th Cir.1993); Uresti v. Lynaugh, 821 F.2d 1099, 1102 (5th Cir.1987); Millard v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 1403, 1407 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 838 , 108 S.Ct. 122 , 98 L.Ed.2d 81 (1987); Liner v. Phelps, 731 F.2d 1201, 1203 (5th Cir.1984); Branch v. Estelle, 631 F.2d 1229, 1233 (5th Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Lawton v. Johnson
See Williams v. Cain, 125 F.3d at 278 (citing Williams v. Collins, 16 F.3d 626, 632 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1289 , 115 S.Ct. 42 , 129 L.Ed.2d 937 (1994)).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANA YUBY PAYAN-PAZ
See Williams v. Collins, 16 F.3d 626, 634-35 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1289 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lambert
The Tenth Circuit has summarized the relevant law in this way: If “mental impairment ... should have reasonably been apparent to ... interrogators,” then “a lesser quantum of coercion [will] render the confession involuntary.” United States v. Sablotny, 21 F.3d 747, 752 (7th Cir.1994); see also Williams v. Collins, 16 F.3d 626, 638 (5th Cir.) (noting as relevant to the petitioner’s claim that his confession to police was involuntary, due to police coercion and to his “diminished capacity,” that neither the police officers, who were experienced in detecting drug or alcohol usage, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Logan
The Tenth Circuit has summarized the relevant law in this way: If “mental impairment ... should have reasonably been apparent to ... interrogators,” then “a lesser quantum of coercion [will] render the confession involuntary.” United States v. Sablotny, 21 F.3d 747, 752 (7th Cir.1994); see also Williams v. Collins, 16 F.3d 626, 638 (5th Cir.) (noting as relevant to the petitioner’s claim that his confession to police was involuntary, due to police coercion and to his “diminished capacity,” that neither the police officers, who were experienced in detecting drug or alcohol usage, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lutz
The Tenth Circuit has summarized the relevant law in this way: If “mental impairment ... should have reasonably been apparent to ... interrogators,” then “a lesser quantum of coercion [will] render the confession involuntary.” United States v. Sablotny, 21 F.3d 747, 752 (7th Cir.1994); see also Williams v. Collins, 16 F.3d 626, 638 (5th Cir.) (noting as relevant to the petitioner’s claim that his confession to police was involuntary, due to police coercion and to his “diminished capacity,” that neither the police officers, who were experienced in detecting drug or alcohol usage, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Florida Bar
v.
Went For It, Inc.
v.
Went For It, Inc.
No. 94-226.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 26, 1994.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. Brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 1994. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.