green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
L) United States v. Sattar (Stewart; Yousry) 1
If "there is evidence to support the district court's 29 finding of reason to believe the jury needs protection," and if -64- 1 "the court has taken reasonable precautions to minimize any 2 prejudicial effects on the defendant and to ensure protection of 3 his fundamental rights, the decision to empanel an anonymous jury 4 is reviewed only for abuse of discretion." United States v. 5 Thai, 29 F.3d 785, 801 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 977 6 (1994). 7 In light of (a) the charges against the defendants, 8 which included a terrorist conspiracy to murder, and Stewart's 9 and Yousry's alleged …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Casillas
See United States v. Thai, 29 F.3d 785, 812-13 (2d Cir.) (evidence of unindicted robberies committed by alleged members of a RICO conspiracy that was charged with, among other things, a string of similar robberies was intrinsic to the RICO conspiracy charge as “acts in furtherance of the RICO conspiracy”), cert. *427 denied, 513 U.S. 977 , 115 S.Ct. 456 , 130 L.Ed.2d 364 (1994). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Velazquez v. Poole
See United States v. Thai, 29 F.3d 785, 808 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 977 , 115 S.Ct. 456 , 130 L.Ed.2d 364 (1994); United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d at 973 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James
See United States v. Thai 29 F.3d 785, 808 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 977 , 115 S.Ct. 456 , 130 L.Ed.2d 364 (1994); United States v. Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F.2d at 973 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Damarious Simmons
See United States v. Fetlow, 21 F.3d 243, 249-50 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 977 , 115 S.Ct. 456 , 130 L.Ed.2d 365 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leslie Russell
See United States v. Urena, 27 F.3d 1487 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 977 , 115 S.Ct. 455 , 130 L.Ed.2d 364 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ng Chong Hwa
See, e.g., United States -34- 1 v. Thai, 29 F.3d 785, 814 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 977 (1994).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Goberdhan
(5×)
Although this case differs from those in which an anonymous jury was utilized for trial in the prosecution of gang-related crimes ( see People v Flores , 153 AD3d at 188 ; see also United States v Thai , 29 F3d 785, 800-801 [2d Cir 1994], cert denied 513 US 977 [1994), organized crime ( see United States v Vario , 943 F2d 236, 241 [2d Cir 1991], cert denied 502 US 1036 [1992]) and acts of terrorism ( see United States v Stewart , 590 F3d 93, 124-125 [2d Cir 2009], cert denied 559 US 1031 [2010]; United States v Pugh , 150 F Supp 3d 218, 223 [ED NY 2015]), that distinction is of no moment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Echevarria-Perez v. Burge
As the Appellate Division found, when the composition of the photo arrays or line-ups themselves are challenged as unfair, the appropriate inquiry for the reviewing court to undertake is to determine “whether the picture of the accused, matching descriptions given by the witness, so stood out from all of the other photographs as to ‘suggest to an identifying witness that [that person] was more likely to be the culprit.’ ” Jarrett v. Headley, 802 F.2d at 41 (quoting United States v. Archibald, 734 F.2d 938, 940 (2d Cir.1984)); see also United States v. Thai, 29 F.3d 785, 808 (2d Cir.199…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Darius Morgan v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility
See, e.g., United States v. Thai, 29 F.3d 785, 800-01 (2d Cir.) (anonymous jury justified by evidence of the defendants’ acts of intimidation toward their crime victims, their attempts to kill certain of those victims, the murder of one robbery victim because of his refusal to retreat from his complaints to the police, and the fact that many members of the defendants’ gang remained at large), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 977 , 115 S.Ct. 456 , 130 L.Ed.2d 364 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth L. Thompson
See, e.g., In re Smith, 10 F.3d 723, 724 (10th Cir.1993) (appellate panel is "bound by the precedent of prior panels"), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 807 (1994). 7 Second, Mr. Thompson claims the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his convictions for intent to distribute methamphetamine. 8 [I]n reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence ... [we] review the record de novo "and ask only whether, taking the evidence--'both direct and circumstantial, together with the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom'--in the light most favorable to the government, a reasonable jury could find the de…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Redmon
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-6202.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1994.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.