green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
4.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1996 ·
…nothing in the 1991 act ... modifies the central holding of wards cove ...
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. State of NC
nothing in the 1991 act ... modifies the central holding of wards cove ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. North Carolina
nothing in the 1991 act ... modifies the central holding of wards cove ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hannon v. Chater
the act significantly modifies the rules that the supreme court announced in wards cove.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Grigsby
State v. Pride, 528 N.W.2d 862, 867 (Minn.1995) (quoting State v. Elijah, 206 Minn. 619, 624 , 289 N.W. 575, 578 (1940)); see also Stephens v. Miller, 13 F.3d 998, 1013 (7th Cir.1994) (Cudahy, J., dissenting) (discussing the similarity between the right to present a defense and the right to confront accusers), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 808 , 115 S.Ct. 57 , 130 L.Ed.2d 15 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kemp
(2×)
See, e.g., Stephens v. Miller, 13 F.3d 998, 1003 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 808 , 115 S.Ct. 57 , 130 L.Ed.2d 15 (1994); Miller v. Keating, 754 F.2d 507 , 509 & n. 1 (3d Cir.1985); Wheeler v. United States, 211 F.2d 19 , 23 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 1019 , 74 S.Ct. 876 , 98 L.Ed. 1140 (1954); State v. Gunby, 282 Kan. 39 , 144 P.3d 647, 661-63 (2006); State v. Hafford, 410 A.2d 219, 220-21 (Me.1980); B & K Rentals & Sales Co. v. Universal Leaf Tobacco Co., 324 Md. 147 , 596 A.2d 640, 644-45 (1991); Bynote v. Nat’l Super Mkts., Inc., 891 S.W.2d 117, 121 (Mo.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Baird
Ed. 2d 37 (1987); see also Stephens v. Miller, 13 F.3d 998, 1002 (7th Cir. 1994), cert, denied, 115 S. Ct. 57 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Crims
(2×)
State v. Pride, 528 N.W.2d 862, 867 (Minn.1995) (quoting State v. Elijah, 206 Minn. 619, 624 , 289 N.W. 575, 578 (1940)); see also Stephens v. Miller, 13 F.3d 998, 1013 (7th Cir.) (Cudahy, J., dissenting) (discussing the similarity between the right *866 to present a defense and to confront accusers), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 57 , 130 L.Ed.2d 15 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Victor Steele v. Robert Farley
See also Stephens v. Miller, 13 F.3d 998, 1001 (7th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 57 (1994) (federal courts on habeas review will not consider the merits of a claim that state courts misapplied their own law); Reed v. Clark, 984 F.2d 209, 210 (1993), aff'd, 115 S.Ct. 57 (1994) (state's alleged failure to comply with state procedural safeguards does not violate federal constitutional due processes) 4 Steele argues that the investigation report is not evidence.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edward R. COLE
v.
Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
v.
Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
No. 93-1765.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
115 S. Ct. 57
Published
Citer courts: E.D. North Carolina (2) · N.D. California (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.