green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases ·
"This circuit clearly allows district courts to consider acquitted conduct at sentencing."
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Louie Morris, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. City of Hobart, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
But see Fleming v. U.S. Postal Serv., 27 F.3d 259, 260 (7th Cir.1994) (stating in dicta that it remains unsettled in the Seventh Circuit whether a dispute over the settlement of a federal case arises under state or federal law), cert denied,U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 741 , — L.Ed.2d - (1995). 4 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. David MacLloyd
this circuit clearly allows district courts to consider acquitted conduct at sentencing.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. George A. Webster
Recognizing that the district judge must "indulge in every reasonable presumption against a defendant's waiver of his right to counsel," id. at 862 (quotation and alteration omitted), we would be extremely reluctant to find that Webster clearly and unequivocally expressed his desire to represent himself.
discussed
Cited "see"
Olugboyega v. INS
See Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten, 27 F.3d 487, 493 (10th Cir. 1994) (noting that a detainer usually only serves as a notice to prison authorities that the INS is 2 going to be making a decision about the deportability of the alien in the future), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 741 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Olabode Olatoni Olugboyega v. Paul Guzik and Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten, 27 F.3d 487, 493 (10th Cir.1994) (noting that a detainer usually only serves as a notice to prison authorities that the INS is going to be making a decision about the deportability of the alien in the future), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 741 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eye v. Fluor Corp.
See Fleming v. United States Postal Service AMF O'Hare, 27 F.3d 259, 260-61 (7th Cir.1994) (holding that settlement was final under Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, §§ 501 et seq., 29 U.S.C. §§ 791 et seq., in the absence of a tender back of consideration received), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1085 , 115 S.Ct. 741 , 130 L.Ed.2d 642 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Green v. State
See Richardson v. State, 879 S.W.2d 874, 881 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 741 , 130 L.Ed.2d 643 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Powell v. Jennifer
See Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten, 27 F.3d 487, 493 (10th Cir.1994) (tracking this change in philosophy and citing cases), cert. denied, - U.S. --, 115 S.Ct. 741 , 130 L.Ed.2d 643 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blistein v. St. John's College
See Fleming v. U.S. Postal Service AMF O'Hare, 27 F.3d 259, 261 (7th Cir. 1994) (noting that the Fifth Circuit in Wamsley "strongly criticized" Oberg, and finding "[t]he idea behind [Oberg] . . . [to be] a little obscure"), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 741 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burton Blistein v. St. John's College
See Fleming v. U.S. Postal Service AMF O’Hare, 27 F.3d 259, 261 (7th Cir.1994) (noting that the Fifth Circuit in Wamsley “strongly criticized” Oberg , and finding “[t]he idea behind [Oberg ] ... [to be] a little obscure”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 741 , 130 L.Ed.2d 642 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colella v. State
(2×)
See Richardson v. State, 879 S.W.2d 874, 880 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 741 , 130 L.Ed.2d 643 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Helen Dunlap v. Chicago Osteopathic Hospital
Lumpkin v. Envirodyne Industries, Inc., 933 F.2d 449, 455 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 939 (1991); see generally Fleming v. U.S. Postal Service AMF O'Hare, 27 F.3d 259, 260 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 741 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Willis-Gomez v. Meissner
See Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten, 27 F.3d 487, 490 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, —- U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 741 , 130 L.Ed.2d 643 (1995) (the right to habeas corpus relief is limited to aliens who are “in custody”); Terrado v. Moyer, 820 F.2d 920, 921 (7th Cir.1987) (INS custody of an alien is a prerequisite to a district court’s exercise of jurisdiction in a habeas case under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(9) .[now Section 1105a(a)(10) ]).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sean Conklin
See, e.g., Hamilton v. Groose, 28 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1085 , 115 S.Ct. 741 , 130 L.Ed.2d 643 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re B. M.
See also Richardson v. State, 879 S.W.2d 874, 879 (Tex.Cr.App.1993), cer t. denied, 513 U.S. 1085 , 115 S.Ct. 741 , 130 L.Ed.2d 643 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re BM
See also Richardson v. State, 879 S.W.2d 874, 879 (Tex. Cr.App.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1085 , 115 S.Ct. 741 , 130 L.Ed.2d 643 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ozoanya v. Reno
See, e.g., Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten, 27 F.3d 487, 492 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1086 , 115 S.Ct. 741 , 130 L.Ed.2d 643 (1995); Orozco v. INS, 911 F.2d 539, 541 (11th Cir.1990); Williams v. INS, 795 F.2d 738, 745 (9th Cir.1986); United States ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Galaviz-Medina
v.
Wooten, Warden
v.
Wooten, Warden
No. 94-6173.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.