green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edgin
(2×)
See United States v. Esqueda-Moreno, 56 F.3d 578, 580 (5th Cir.) ("[A] Rule 32 violation may be addressed for the first time on appeal ...."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 348 , 133 L.Ed.2d 244 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GLYN EARL JOHNSON, also known as G
See United States v. Esqueda-Moreno, 56 F.3d 578 , 580 n.2 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 348 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Chapman
United States v. Lyton, 161 F. 3d at 1170 (citing United States v. Ramos, 42 F. 3d 1160, 1163 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1134 , 115 S.Ct. 2015 , 131 L.Ed. 2d 1013 (1995)); see also United States v. Johnson, 58 F. 3d 356, 358 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 936 , 116 S.Ct. 348 , 133 L.Ed. 2d 245 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel Franklin Lyton
In addition, because Turner and Lyton gave inconsistent stories, Brehm was entitled “to expand the scope of the stop and ask additional, more intrusive, questions.” United States v. Ramos, 42 F.3d *1171 1160, 1163 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1134 , 115 S.Ct. 2015 , 131 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1995); see also United States v. Johnson, 58 F.3d 356, 358 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 936 , 116 S.Ct. 348 , 133 L.Ed.2d 245 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gaviria
Montague at 1256 ; see also United States v. Sobin, 56 F.3d 1423, 1429 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 348 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gaviria
Montague at 1256 ; see also United States v. Sobin, 56 F.3d 1423, 1429 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 348 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dennis SOBIN
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 95-5964.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1995.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.