green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Ebling v. United States Department of Justice
See United States v. Jones, 58 F.3d 688, 691 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 970 , 116 S.Ct. 430 , 133 L.Ed.2d 346 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Burboa
See United States v. Buchanan, 59 F.3d 914, 917-18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 970 , 116 S.Ct. 430 , 133 L.Ed.2d 345 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Burboa
See United States v. Buchanan, 59 F.3d 914, 917-18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 970 , 116 S.Ct. 430 , 133 L.Ed.2d 345 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Whitesell
See United States v. Jackson, 57 F.3d 1012, 1019 (11th Cir.) (stating that “it is the settled law of this circuit that at sentencing, a federal defendant’s due process rights are satisfied by the preponderance of the evidence standard”) (internal citations omitted), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 970 , 116 S.Ct. 432 , 133 L.Ed.2d 346 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angleton
See McKinney, 53 F.3d at 676 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 970 , 116 S.Ct. 431 , 133 L.Ed.2d 346 (1995) (federal prosecution not barred by prior state guilty plea); United States v. Guzman, 85 F.3d 823, 826 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1020 , 117 S.Ct. 537 , 136 L.Ed.2d 422 (1996) (federal prosecution not barred by prior foreign conviction); United States v. Sewell, 252 F.3d 647 (2d Cir.2001) (federal prosecution not barred by prior state acquittal); United States v. Bell, 113 F.3d 1345 , 1351 n. 6 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 984 , 118 S.Ct. 447 , 139 L.Ed.2d 383 (1997) (federal prosec…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Blanco-Rodriguez
(2×)
See United States v. Hill, 60 F.3d 672, 676 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 970 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bornfield
See United States v. Hill, 60 F.3d 672, 676 (10th Cir.) (admission of evidence under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) is subject to review for an abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 970 , 116 S.Ct. 432 , 133 L.Ed.2d 347 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Campbell
See e.g., United States v. Hill, 60 F.3d 672 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 970 , 116 S.Ct. 432 , 133 L.Ed.2d 347 (1995); United States v. Hill, 898 F.2d 72 (7th Cir.1990); United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471 (9th Cir.), 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); United States v. Renteria, 625 F.2d 1279 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Knight, 185 F.Supp.2d 65 (D.D.C.2002); United States v. Ozuna, 129 F.Supp.2d 1345 (S.D.Fla.2001), aff'd, 48 Fed.Appx. 739 (11th Cir.2002); United States v. Perez, 562 F.Supp. 574 (D.N.J.1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Snell
See, e.g., United States v. ReBrook, 58 F.3d 961, 970 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 970 , 116 S.Ct. 431 , 133 L.Ed.2d 346 (1995); Tomblin, 46 F.3d at 1391 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lee Roy Parker
See, e.g., United States v. Buchanan, 59 F.3d 914, 920 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied 516 U.S. 970 , 116 S.Ct. 430 , 133 L.Ed.2d 345 (1995) (enhancement of offense level “reflects the Sentencing Commission’s view that failing to appear for trial obstructs and unduly delays the criminal process.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ReBrook
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-6317.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1995.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.