green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.4 score
“baker ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Coleman
See Coleman v. United States, 516 U.S. 980 , 116 S.Ct. 486 , 133 L.Ed.2d 413 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Young
See United States v. Skorniak, 59 F.3d 750, 758 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 980 , 116 S.Ct. 487 , 133 L.Ed.2d 414 (1995); United States v. Eagle, 586 F.2d 1193, 1197 (8th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raul Sanchez-Flores
See United States v. Skorniak, 59 F.3d 750, 758 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 980 , 116 S.Ct. 487 , 133 L.Ed.2d 414 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martha Molina
See United States v. Skorniak, 59 F.3d 750, 757 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 980 , 116 S.Ct. 487 , 133 L.Ed.2d 414 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
ca8 1999
See United States v. Skorniak, 59 F.3d 750, 757 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 980 , 116 S.Ct. 487 , 133 L.Ed.2d 414 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Jove Engineering, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service
See In re Delta Resources, Inc., 54 F.3d 722, 727 (11th Cir.), cert. denied , — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 488 , 133 L.Ed.2d 415 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Langston
See Annotation, Exclusion of Witnesses under Rule 615 of Federal Rules of Evidence, 48 ALR Fed. 484 (1980 & 1999 Supp.); see also United States v. Jackson, 60 F.3d 128, 134, 135 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 980 , 1130, and 1165, 116 S.Ct. 487 , 951, 1057, 133 L.Ed.2d 414, 875 , 134 L.Ed.2d 201 (1995); United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d 1058, 1076 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2928 , 64 L.Ed.2d 815 (1980); United States v. Johnston, 578 F.2d 1352, 1355 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 931 , 99 S.Ct. 321 , 58 L.Ed.2d 325 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca8 1999
See, e.g., United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377, 1386 (8th Cir.1981); see also United States v. Skorniak, 59 F.3d 750, 755-56 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 980 , 116 S.Ct. 487 , 133 L.Ed.2d 414 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Everett Kyle Hall
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377, 1386 (8th Cir. 1981); see also United States v. Skorniak, 59 F.3d 750, 755-56 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 980 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Key Bank National Ass'n v. Milham
(2×)
See, e.g., Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. Delta Resources, Inc. (In re Delta Resources, Inc.), 54 F.3d 722, 729 (11th Cir.) (“[A]n overseeured creditor ... is entitled to receive postpetition interest as part of its claim at the time of confirmation of a plan or reorganization .... ”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 980 , 116 S.Ct. 488 , 133 L.Ed.2d 415 (1995); In re DeMaggio, 175 B.R. at 150 (“[Section] 506(b) determines the exact amount of the claim____”); In re Foertsch, 167 B.R. 555, 560 (Bankr.D.N.D.1994) (“[Section] 506(b) allows an overseeured creditor to enhance its claim by adding to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Milham
(2×)
See, e.g., Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. Delta Resources, Inc. (In re Delta Resources, Inc.), 54 F.3d 722, 729 (11th Cir.) ("[A]n oversecured creditor ... is entitled to receive postpetition interest as part of its claim at the time of confirmation of a plan or reorganization ...."), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 980 , 116 S.Ct. 488 , 133 L.Ed.2d 415 (1995); In re DeMaggio, 175 B.R. at 150 ("[Section] 506(b) determines the exact amount of the claim...."); In re Foertsch, 167 B.R. 555, 560 (Bankr.D.N.D.1994) ("[Section] 506(b) allows an oversecured creditor to enhance its claim by adding to it postpet…
Orix Credit Alliance, Inc.
v.
Delta Resources, Inc.
v.
Delta Resources, Inc.
No. 95-450.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1995.
Cited by 15 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Motions of American Council of Life Insurance and General Motors Acceptance Corp. et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.