Whren v. United States, 516 U.S. 1036 (1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Whren v. United States, 516 U.S. 1036 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Larry W. Smith, James M. Shepherd, Ernesto M. Sanchez, and Benjamin R. Shepherd III (ca7, 1996-04-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Larry W. Smith, James M. Shepherd, Ernesto M. Sanchez, and Benjamin R. Shepherd III
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Whren v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 690 , 133 L.Ed.2d 595 (1996) (Question presented: Was pretextual traffic stop undertaken by officers who were prohibited by police department regulations from making traffic .stops objectively unreasonable under Fourth Amendment when no reasonable officer in those circumstances would have made such stop (test used by Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits), or was such stop permissible as long as it could have been made because of traffic violation (test used by D.C., Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits)?); see also, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whren
v.
United States
No. 95-5841.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 5, 1996.
516 U.S. 1036
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis [*1037] granted. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 16, 1996. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 15, 1996. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed pursuant to this Court’s Rule 25.3. Rule 29.2 does not apply.