green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
7.6 score
“wjrongdo-ing... that adversely affects all depositors creates a liability which is an asset of the bank, and only the bank or its receiver may sue for its recovery.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Ernst & Young, LLP
wjrongdo-ing... that adversely affects all depositors creates a liability which is an asset of the bank, and only the bank or its receiver may sue for its recovery.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nichols v. Lewis Grocer
we have traditionally been very cautious about self-serving and conélusory testimony'based on a subjective belief that ... discrimination occurred.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
77 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1555, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,349 Vera Ann Nichols, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lewis Grocer, a Division of Supervalu, Inc., Lewis Grocer, a Division of Supervalu, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
we have traditionally been very cautious about self-serving and conclusory testimony based on a subjective belief that ... discrimination occurred.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ellis v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
the adea does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of salary or seniority.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Northwest Airlines Corp.
See Wallace v. Bank of Bartlett, 55 F.3d 1166,1168 (6th Cir.1995) (observing that parallel conduct, “without more, does not itself establish a violation of the Sherman Act”), cert, denied, 516 U.S. 1047 , 116 S.Ct. 709 , 133 L.Ed.2d 664 (1996); Blomkest Fertilizer, 203 F.3d at 1032-33 (noting that the same is true even with conscious parallelism).
cited
Cited "see"
Beverly BAUER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALBEMARLE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
See Armendariz v. Pinkerton Tobacco Co., 58 F.3d 144, 150 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1047 , 116 S.Ct. 709 , 133 L.Ed.2d 664 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Uherek v. Houston Light and Power Co.
See Armendariz v. Pinkerton Tobacco Co., 58 F.3d 144, 152 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1047 , 116 S.Ct. 709 , 133 L.Ed.2d 664 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nicolas v. Deposit Guaranty National Bank
See Wallace v. Bank of Bartlett, 55 F.3d 1166 (6th Cir.1995) (addressing similar factors set forth by repealed 12 C.F.R. § 7.8000 ), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1047 , 116 S.Ct. 709 , 133 L.Ed.2d 664 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Betty Travis v. The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System University of Texas, at San Antonio
See Armendariz v. Pinkerton Tobacco Co., 58 F.3d 144, 153 (5th Cir.1995) (reversing a jury verdict of discrimination and collecting cases), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 709 , 133 L.Ed.2d 664 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Arends v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.
See Armendariz v. Pinkerton Tobacco Co., 58 F.3d 144, 152 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 709 , 133 L.Ed.2d 664 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.
See id., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 1992 WL 696398 (Apr. 30, 1992), aff'd, 51 F.3d 1411 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 709 , 133 L.Ed.2d 664 (1996). *192 Based on the racketeering activity alleged by the Hamid plaintiffs, the petitioners here (formerly the Hamid plaintiffs) claim an interest in all of the assets forfeited to the United States by BCCI.
cited
Cited "see"
Mosley v. Houston Community College System
See Armendariz v. Pinkerton Tobacco Co., 58 F.3d 144, 153 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 709 , 133 L.Ed.2d 664 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
BETTY TRAVIS v. THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM; UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, at San Antonio
See Armendariz v. Pinkerton Tobacco Co., 58 F.3d 144, 153 (5th Cir. 1995) (reversing a jury verdict of discrimination and collecting 16 cases), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S. Ct. 709 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lupo v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories
Compare Mot. at 8 with Armendariz v. Pinkerton Tobacco Co., 58 F.3d 144, 149 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1047 , 116 S.Ct. 709 , 133 L.Ed.2d 664 (1996). 18 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
1120 Central Condominiums Owners Assn.
v.
City of Seal Beach, California
v.
City of Seal Beach, California
No. 95-715.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 1996.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.