green
Positive treatment
9.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hudson
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 964 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 944 , 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean Jackson
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 970 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 944 , 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. D'Armond
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 971 (10th Cir.) (“We have previously held that where an officer has made a lawful arrest of a suspect in an automobile, the officer may seize items of evidence found within the passenger compartment of the vehicle as part of a search incident to a lawful arrest, even when the suspect is outside of the vehicle and handcuffed.”), cer t. denied, 519 U.S. 944 , 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. United States
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 962-66 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 944 , 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Olguin-Rivera
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 971 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 944 , 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996); United States v. Lugo, 978 F.2d 631, 634 (10th Cir.1992). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
(2×)
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 967 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 331 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jay Van Jackson, Iii, AKA Little Jay, United States of America v. Paul Sheldon Cromartie, AKA Shy-Lo AKA Paul Miller
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 967 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronnie Sims
See United States v. Galbraith, 20 F.3d 1054, 1058 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 889 , 115 S.Ct. 233 , 130 L.Ed.2d 157 (1994). 8 Though this Circuit has recognized that "sufficiently egregious government conduct may affect [a] sentencing determination," United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 963 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996), a downward departure based on outrageous government conduct may be granted "only [in] the most egregious circumstances," United States v. Mosely, 965 F.2d 906, 914 (10th Cir.1992); Lacey, 86 F.3d at 966 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lin Lyn Trading, Ltd., and Raymond Lynn Thomas
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 971 (10th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lin Lyn Trading, Ltd
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 971 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 331 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aragon
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 967 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lacey
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vernoil Cantley, AKA Joe Joe Cantley
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 967 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cantley
(2×)
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 967 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 331 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Van Ray Yarnell
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 967 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 *1139 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996); United States v. Cordoba, 71 F.3d 1543, 1547 (10th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yarnell
See United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 967 (10th Cir.), 10 Unlike his pretrial response to the presentence report's "total loss" computation, Yarnell clearly and properly objected to the presentence report's characterization of his criminal activity as involving five or more participants or being otherwise extensive. - 25 - cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 331 (1996); United States v. Cordoba, 71 F.3d 1543, 1547 (10th Cir. 1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Foster v. Ward
See, e.g., United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 973 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 944 , 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Guadalupe Altamirano
At a minimum, the government must prove that "five persons participated in the criminal venture, and that Defendant exercised leadership control over at least one person." Cruz Camacho, 137 F.3d at 1224 (citing Eighth, Fifth, and Ninth Circuits cases agreeing with this proposition); see also United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 967 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, U.S., --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 331 , 136 L.Ed.2d 244 (1996). 15 Defendant does not dispute the court's finding as to the number of persons involved in the conspiracy; he only contests the court's finding that he was a leader or an organize…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Altamirano
At a minimum, the government must prove that “five persons participated in the criminal venture, and that Defendant exercised leadership control over at least one person.” Cruz Camacho, 137 F.3d at 1224 (citing Eighth, Fifth, and Ninth Circuits cases agreeing with this proposition); see also United States v. Lacey, 86 F.3d 956, 967 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, U.S. , 117 S. Ct. 331 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martinez
v.
Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
v.
Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
No. 96-6011.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1996.
Published
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.