green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.2 score
“the general requirement underlying a showing of the likelihood of confusion is that the public believes that 'the mark's owner sponsored or otherwise approved the use of the trademark.”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Tandon v. United Air Lines
But see Bickel v. Korean Air Lines Co. Ltd., 96 F.3d 151, 153-54 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997) (on rehearing, court reversed a denial of damages for pain and suffering under DOSHA and held that “[t]he Zicherman opinion therefore neither added to, nor made any changes in, the law regarding the availability of nonpecuniary damages under DOHSA.”).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lumsden v. Design Tech Builders, Inc.
cause of action 'accrues' when plaintiff knew or should have known that actionable harm has been done to him.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sports Authority, Inc. v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Inc.
the general requirement underlying a showing of the likelihood of confusion is that the public believes that 'the mark's owner sponsored or otherwise approved the use of the trademark.
discussed
Cited "see"
Osborne v. Elmer
See Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329, 334, n. 7 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1093 , 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 715 (1997). 9 . 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (8). 10 . 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (g). 11 . 534 U.S. 184 , 122 S.Ct. 681 , 151 L.Ed.2d 615 (2002). 12 . 527 U.S. 471 , 119 S.Ct. 2139 , 144 L.Ed.2d 450 (1999). 13 . 527 U.S. 555 , 119 S.Ct. 2162 , 144 L.Ed.2d 518 (1999). 14 . 527 U.S. 516 , 119 S.Ct. 2133 , 144 L.Ed.2d 484 (1999). 15 . 122 S.Ct. at 693 .
cited
Cited "see"
Lloyd Marks v. Newcourt Credit Group, Inc.
P. 28(a); see Bickel v. Korean Air Lines Co., 96 F.3d 151, 153 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1093 , 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Daimlerchrysler Ag Mercedes-Benz Usa, Inc. v. Donald H. Bloom Mbz Communications, Inc.
See Holiday Inns, Inc. v. 800 Reservation, Inc., 86 F.3d 619, 626 (6th Cir.1996) (“[T]he defendants’ use of a protected mark or their use of a misleading representation is a prerequisite to the finding of a Lanham Act violation.”), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1093 , 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 715 (1997); Miss Dig Sys., Inc. v. Power Plus Eng’g, Inc., 944 F.Supp. 600, 602 (E.D.Mich.1996) (“[A]s the language of these statutory provisions shows ... the court ... must first find that the defendant ... has made an actual ‘use’ of the plaintiffs trademark.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Charles A. Muer
See Bickel v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., 96 F.3d 151, 154 (6th Cir.1996) ("Bickel II "), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Muer v. Karbel
See Bickel v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., 96 F.3d 161, 154 (6th Cir.1996) (“Bickel II”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
U.S. Structures, Incorporated, a Foreign Corporation v. J.P. Structures, Incorporated, a Michigan Corporation, and Joseph J. Pilat
See generally Holiday Inns, Inc. v. 800 Reservation, Inc., 86 F.3d 619, 622-23 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 715 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oldham v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.
See Bickel v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., 96 F.3d 151, 153-54 (6th Cir.1996) (declining, in a related case, to address pre-death pain and suffering claims because issue was not raised in initial briefs), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Oldham, Nan M. v. Korean Airln Co Ltd
See Bickel v. Korean Air Lines C., Ltd., 96 F.3d 151, 153-54 (6th Cir.1996) (declining, in a related case, to address pre-death pain and suffering claims because issue was not raised in initial briefs), cert. denied, - U.S. , 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ingles v. Neiman Marcus Group
See Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329, 332 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 715 (1997); Rogers v. International Marine Terminals, Inc., 87 F.3d 755, 758 (5th Cir.1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerina v. Richardson Automotive, Inc.
See Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329, 332 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 715 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
JOANNE S. WATTERS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION DISTRICT; MARY LADORE MABBITT
See Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329, 332 (5th Cir. 1996) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 12112 ), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 770 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anderson v. City of Dallas Texas
Likewise, this court *29 has held that “[a]n employer’s belief that an employee is unable to perform one task with an adequate safety margin does not establish per se that the employer regards the employee as having a substantial limitation on his ability to work in general.” Chandler v. City of Dallas, 2 F.3d 1385, 1390 (5th Cir.1993); see also Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329, 332 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1093 , 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 715 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Baylor University
See, e.g., Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329, 332-34 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 770 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beckwith v. Giles
See § 544.275, RSMo 1994; § 561.031, RSMo 1999 Cum.Supp.; Rule 57.07(a)(2); see also Call v. Heard, 925 S.W.2d 840, 846 (Mo. banc 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1093 , 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rock & Roll Hall of Fame & Museum, Inc. v. Gentile Productions
See, e.g., Holiday Inns, Inc. v. 800 Reservation, Inc., 86 F.3d 619, 622-23 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1093 , 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 715 (1997); Homeowners Group, Inc. v. Home Marketing Specialists, Inc., 931 F.2d 1100, 1105 (6th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Blatter
(2×)
P. 28(a)(3) and (b) (stating that the appellee's brief must include an argument containing the contentions of the parties and the reasons for them); see also Bickel v. Korean Air Lines Co., 96 F.3d 151, 153 (6th Cir.1996) (defendant waived issue by failing to raise it in its opening briefs to the court of appeals), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1093 , 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997) 1 In the original panel decision, the court reasoned that dismissal was proper because Thaddeus-X and Bell had failed to show actual prejudice.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc. The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Foundation, Inc. v. Gentile Productions Charles M. Gentile
(2×)
See, e.g., Holiday Inns, Inc. v. 800 Reservation, Inc., 86 F.3d 619, 622-23 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 715 (1997); Homeowners Group, Inc. v. Home Marketing Specialists, Inc., 931 F.2d 1100, 1105 (6th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. Brown & Sturm
(2×)
The Court of Appeals tempered the harshness of this “date of wrong” rule by adopting the discovery rule, “by which the action is deemed to accrue on the date when the plaintiff knew or, with due diligence, reasonably should have known of the wrong.” Id.; see also Doe v. Maskell, 342 Md. 684, 690 , 679 A.2d 1087 (1996), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997); Edmonds v. Cytology Servs. of Md.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dalrymple v. Brown
(2×)
Super.1995) (disallowing testimony concerning recovered memory of sexual assault in a criminal trial because the phenomenon of repressed memory is subject to “violent” disagreement); see also Doe v. Maskell, 342 Md. 684 , 679 A.2d 1087 (1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 770 , 136 L.Ed.2d 716 (1997)(noting serious disagreement in the psychological community concerning repression theory).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Burgard v. Super Valu Holdings
See 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (l); see also Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329, 332 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 770 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gregory P. Burgard v. Super Valu Holdings, Inc., Also Known as Wetterau, Incorporated, Doing Business as Ohio Cubco, Inc., a Missouri Corporation
See 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (l); see also Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329, 332 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 770 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McKey v. Occidental Chemical Corp.
See, e.g., Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329, 334 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 770 , — L.Ed.2d -(1997) (hemophilia that excluded plaintiff from his chosen occupational field of firefighter is not a substantial limitation on the major life activity of working); Rogers v. International Marine Terminals, Inc., 87 F.3d 755, 759 (5th Cir.1996) (chronic ankle problems including gout, bone spurs, and ligament damage that required plaintiff to miss more than one year of work was not severe enough or chronic enough to qualify as a disability); Ellison v. Software Spectrum…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Plescher
v.
Wille, Sheriff, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
v.
Wille, Sheriff, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
No. 96-807.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1) · E.D. Michigan (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.