Picklesimer v. Cox, 519 U.S. 822 (1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Picklesimer v. Cox, 519 U.S. 822 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dean Butch Wilson v. John W. Jones, Jr. (ca11, 2000-08-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Dean Butch Wilson v. John W. Jones, Jr.
11th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dekalb County School District v. Schrenko, 109 F.3d 680, 687 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 79 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Charles A. Muer
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Under Rule F of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, a shipowner-petitioner "may demand exoneration from as well as limitation of liability" and "shipowners routinely seek exoneration and limitation of liability in the alternative." Texaco, Inc. v. Williams, 47 F.3d 765 , 769 & n. 19 (5th Cir.1995); see also Odeco Oil and Gas Co., Drilling Div. v. Bonnette, 74 F.3d 671 , 675 n. 7 (5th Cir.) ("Exoneration is not mentioned in the Limitation Act, but the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims state that a complaint seeking limitation may also dem…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Estate of Muer v. Karbel
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Under Rule F of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, a shipowner-petitioner "may demand exoneration from as well as limitation of liability” and “shipowners routinely seek exoneration and limitation of liability in the alternative.” Texaco, Inc. v. Williams, 47 F.3d 765 , 769 & n. 19 (5th Cir.1995); see also Odeco Oil and Gas Co., Drilling Div. v. Bonnette, 74 F.3d 671 , 675 n. 7 (5th Cir.) ("Exoneration is not mentioned in the Limi- ■ tation Act, but the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims state that a complaint seeking limitation …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tmt North America, Incorporated v. Magic Touch Gmbh
7th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Specifically, acquiescence refers to “cases where the trademark owner, by affirmative word or deed, conveys its implied consent to another.” 4 McCarthy, supra, § 31:41; see also SunAmerica Corp. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, 77 F.3d 1325, 1334 (11th Cir.) (SunAmerica II), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 79 , 136 L.Ed.2d 37 (1996).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Racine v. American International Adjustment Co.
D. Vt. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Logan v. Bennington College Corp., 72 F.3d 1017, 1025 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 79 , 136 L.Ed.2d 37 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Picklesimer
v.
Cox
No. 95-2037.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1996.
519 U.S. 822
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.