green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
8.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1998 ·
…prior to the aedpa's enactment, state prisoners had almost unfettered discretion in deciding when to file a federal habeas petition .... aedpa dramatically changed this landscape, shortening the time for filing a federal habeas petition to one year.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rice v. Trippett
o petition filed on or before april 23, 1997 - one year from the date of aedpa's enactment - may be dismissed for failure to comply with time limit
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Matthews v. Abramajtys
o petition filed on or before april 23, 1997-one year from the date of aedpa's enactment-may be dismissed for failure to comply with time limit
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sperling v. White
prior to the aedpa's enactment, state prisoners had almost unfettered discretion in deciding when to file a federal habeas petition .... aedpa dramatically changed this landscape, shortening the time for filing a federal habeas petition to one year.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sperling v. White
prior to the aedpa's enactment, state prisoners had almost unfettered discretion in deciding when to file a federal habeas petition .... aedpa dramatically changed this landscape, shortening the time for filing a federal habeas petition to one year.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Kumar v. United States
Ct., 128 F.3d 1283, 1289 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1099 , 118 S. Ct. 899 7 (1998), overruled on other grounds, Calderon v. United States Dist.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Miller v. NJ Dept Corr
Court, 128 F.3d 1283, 1289 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 899 3 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Sanders v. Dakota District Court
See Calderon v. United States District Court, 128 F.3d 1283 , 1287–88 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1099 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mathison v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Cicero, 214 F.3d 199, 203 (D.C.Cir.2000) (citing Calderon v. United States District Court, 128 F.3d 1283, 1288 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1099 , 118 S.Ct. 899 , 139 L.Ed.2d 884 (1998)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buckley v. Terhune
(2×)
See Calderon v. United States District Court (Beeler), 128 F.3d 1283, 1286-1287 (9th Cir.1997) (holding that the one-year statute of limitations did not begin to run against any petitioner until the AED-PA’s effective date of April 24, 1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1099 , 118 S.Ct. 899 , 139 L.Ed.2d 884 & 523 U.S. 1061 , 118 S.Ct. 1389 , 140 L.Ed.2d 648 (1998), overruled on other grounds by Calderon v. United States District Court (Kelly), 163 F.3d 530 , 540 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1060 , 119 S.Ct. 1377 , 143 L.Ed.2d 535 (1999). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dictado v. Ducharme
See Calderon v. United States District Court, 128 F.3d 1283, 1287 (9th Cir.1997) (concluding that allowing AEDPA’s limitations period to begin be fore the statute’s enactment would have impermissible retroactive effect), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 899 , 139 L.Ed.2d 884 (1998), overruled in part on other grounds by Calderon v. United States District Court, 163 F.3d 530 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1377 , 143 L.Ed.2d 535 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herbert Louis BURDEAU, Defendant-Appellant
See Calderon v. United States District Court for C.D.Cal., 128 F.3d 1283 , 1286 n. 2 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 899 , 139 L.Ed.2d 884 (1998), overruled on other grounds, Calderon v. United States District Court for C.D.Cal., 163 F.3d 530 , 1998 WL 848032 (9th Cir.1998) ("[A] judgment does not become final following appeal until the case is returned to the district court and the mandate is spread.”). .
cited
Cited "see"
Salameh v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
See Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 120 F.3d 1006, 1010-12 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied , — - U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 899 , 139 L.Ed.2d 884 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schadler v. Anthem Life Insurance
See Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 120 F.3d 1006, 1013 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) (remanding the case to the plan administrator which had not interpreted the provision at issue in the first instance because it had found for the defendants on alternative grounds), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 899 , 139 L.Ed.2d 884 (1998); id. at 1022 n. 4 (O’Scannlain, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (“[T]he Plan Administrator had no need to reach the question of the meaning of [the plan provision at issue on appeal] since it had already determined that the [plaintiffs] were not entitled t…
cited
Cited "see"
Miller v. Marr
See Calderon v. United States District Court, 128 F.3d 1283, 1287-88 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 899 , 139 L.Ed.2d 884 (1998).
examined
Cited "see"
Williams v. Vaughn
(3×)
Id.; accord, Calderon v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, 128 F.3d 1283, 1287 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 899 , 139 L.Ed.2d 884 (1998); United States v.. Simmonds, 111 F.3d 737, 745 (10th Cir.1997); Lindh v. Murphy, 96 F.3d 856, 866 (7th Cir.1996), rev’d on other grounds, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2059 , 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997); Reyes v. Keane, 90 F.3d 676, 679 (2d Cir.1996); Green v. Wharton, 1997 WL 404278 at *2 (N.D.Ga. 1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
D'ANNUNZIO v. Prudential Ins. Co.
See, e.g., Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 97 F. 3d 1187, 1189-90 (9th Cir.1996), adhered to on rehearing en banc, 120 F. 3d 1006 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1098 , 118 S.Ct. 899 , 139 L.Ed. 2d 884 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donna J. Gentile v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
See Ward, 135 F.3d at 1289 ; Cisneros, 134 F.3d at 947-48; see also Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 120 F.3d 1006, 1013-14 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 899 , 139 L.Ed.2d 884 (1998); Saffle v. Sierra Pac.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Martin
No. 97-907.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 26, 1998.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.