green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.2 score
“ourts generally agree that the giving of miranda warnings does not convert a interview into a custodial one ... although it is a factor that a court may consider when assessing custody”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Castillo
ourts generally agree that the giving of miranda warnings does not convert a interview into a custodial one ... although it is a factor that a court may consider when assessing custody
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Watley v. Williams
he right to present defense witnesses is not absolute. a defendant must abide by the rules of evidence and procedure.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Galiczynski
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
put succinctly, ' prosecutor's compliance with 851(a)(1) is simply a necessary condition to a judge's imposing an enhanced sentence on the basis of a defendant's pri- or convictions.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hbaiu
See United States v. Bautista, 145 F.3d 1140, 1151 (10th Cir.) cert. denied 525 U.S. 911 , 119 S.Ct. 255 , 142 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998); Robinson v. Trast, 128 F.Supp.2d 710, 716 (D.Kan.2001). 55 . 446 U.S. 291, 297 , 100 S.Ct. 1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980). 56 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric Daniel Harris
See United States v. Bautista, 145 F.3d 1140, 1151 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 911 , 119 S.Ct. 255 , 142 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998); Tukes v. Dugger, 911 F.2d 508 , 516 n. 11 (11th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Holman v. Mike Kemna, Superintendent
See United States v. Bautista, 145 F.3d 1140, 1147 (10th Cir.) (to implicate the Miranda-Edwards right to counsel prophylaxis, both a custodial situation and official interrogation are required), cert. denied, Bautista v. United States, 525 U.S. 911 , 119 S.Ct. 255 , 142 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Cornel Cooks v. Ron Ward, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, McAlester Oklahoma
See United States v. Bautista, 145 F.3d 1140, 1146 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 255 , 142 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mora
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Kennedy, 133 F.3d 53, 59 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 911 , 119 S.Ct. 255 , 142 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998); United States v. Romero-Carrion, 54 F.3d 15, 18 (1st Cir.1995); Kelly v. United States, 29 F.3d 1107, 1111 (7th Cir.1994); United States v. Weaver, 905 F.2d 1466, 1481 (11th Cir.1990); United States v. Olson, 716 F.2d 850, 852-53 (11th Cir.1983). [¶ 35] The rationale for the refusal to apply harmless error analysis was explained in Olson, 716 F.2d at 853 : An enhanced sentence is a special remedy prescribed by the Congress; prosecutorial discretion is vested in…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kazandjian
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 98-5578.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1998.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.