Smith v. Laser, Wilson, /Buford & Watts, P.C., 119 S. Ct. 445 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Smith v. Laser, Wilson, /Buford & Watts, P.C., 119 S. Ct. 445 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps (ca9, 2002-09-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duffield v. Robertson, Stephens & Co., 525 U.S. 982 , 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duffield v. Robertson, Stephens & Co., 525 U.S. 982 , 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Samedi v. Miami-Dade County
S.D. Fla. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mencer v. Hammonds, 134 F.3d 1066 , 1070 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 982 , 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998) (noting the intent requirement established for equal protection violations in Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 239-44 , 96 S.Ct. 2040 , 48 L.Ed.2d 597 (1976)).
cited Cited "see" Kindred v. Second Judicial District Court of Nevada
Nev. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co., 144 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 445 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Susan A. Desiderio v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co., 144 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.), cert. denied , — U.S. -, -, 119 S.Ct. 445 , 465, 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Kenneth E. Sutton, Jr. v. Providence St. Joseph Medical Center, a California Non-Profit Corporation
9th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co., 144 F.3d 1182, 1202 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998); Monterey Mechanical Co. v. Wilson, 125 F.3d 702, 708 (9th Cir.1997); Morse v. North Coast Opportunities, Inc., 118 F.3d 1338, 1342 (9th Cir.1997); Broad v. Sealaska Corp., 85 F.3d 422, 431 (9th Cir.1996); Price, 939 F.2d at 707-09 ; Gorenc, 869 F.2d at 508-09 .
discussed Cited "see" EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANK’S NURSERY & CRAFTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee (2×)
6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co., 144 F.3d 1182, 1198-1200 (9th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998). .
discussed Cited "see" Hart v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
S.D.N.Y. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co., 144 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 and — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 465 , 142 L.Ed.2d 418 (1998) (Nos. 98-237 and 98-409).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re David's Supermarkets, Inc.
Tex. App. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co., 144 F.3d 1182 , 1187 n. 3 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 982 , 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998); Swenson, 858 F.2d at 1309 ; DeSapio, 143 Misc.2d at 616 , 540 N.Y.S.2d at 936 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Miller v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.
E.D. Pa. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
In fact, one of the clear purposes of the 1991 Act was “to provide appropriate remedies for intentional discrimination and unlawful harassment in the workplace.” 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Historical and Statutory Notes section entitled Purposes of 1991 Amendments (emphasis added); see also, Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co., 144 F.3d 1182, 1193 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 982 , 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998) (characterizing this purpose as the “primary purpose”). 9 This point deserves attention because denying class certification does not mean that plaintiffs will ultimately …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Howard SMITH, Trustee for the Estates of Marilyn A. Hanson and Lynn M. Rice
v.
LASER, WILSON, /BUFORD & WATTS, P.C.
No. 98-400.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1998.
119 S. Ct. 445
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.