cited Cited "see" United States v. Pickard See United States v. Owens, 159 F.3d 221, 227 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 817 , 120 S.Ct. 56 , 145 L.Ed.2d 49 (1999).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. Solstice ABS CBO II, Ltd. See, e.g., Lightfoot v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 98-7166, 175 F.3d 1008 (table), 1999 WL 110424 at *2 (2d Cir. Mar. 1, 1999) (expert testimony was properly excluded where it was only relevant to previously rejected claims, “Where the record indicates that the expert failed to consider necessary factors or that his analysis rests on faulty assumptions, the trial court has discretion to exclude his proffered testimony for lack of probative value.”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 817 , 120 S.Ct. 56 , 145 L.Ed.2d 49 (1999); Boucher v. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp., 73 F.3d 18, 22 (2d Cir.1996) (“We hold …

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ballinger See, e.g., United States v. Owens, 159 F.3d 221, 226 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 817 , 120 S.Ct. 56 , 145 L.Ed.2d 49 (1999) (“Where a statute regulates the ‘instrumentalities of interstate commerce,’ the law need not address conduct having a substantial effect on interstate commerce in order to survive a constitutional challenge.” (citing Lopez, 514 U.S. at 558 , 115 S.Ct. 1624 )). *1371 C.