green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lubin v. State
See Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29 (Fla.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 859 , 121 S.Ct. 145 , 148 L.Ed.2d 96 (2000); see also Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla.1999); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carrada v. State
See Morton v. State, 689 So.2d 259, 264 (Fla.1997), receded from on other grounds by Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29 (Fla.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 859 , 121 S.Ct. 145 , 148 L.Ed.2d 96 (2000); Dudley v. State, 545 So.2d 857, 858-60 (Fla.1989), receded from on other grounds by Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29 (Fla.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 859 , 121 S.Ct. 145 , 148 L.Ed.2d 96 (2000); Bolin v. State, 736 So.2d 1160, 1166 (Fla. 1999); Senterfitt v. State, 837 So.2d 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); James v. State, 765 So.2d 763 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Bowles v. State, 742 So.2d 821, 823 (Fla. 4th DC…
cited
Cited "see"
Cunningham v. State
See Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 41 (Fla.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 859 , 121 S.Ct. 145 , 148 L.Ed.2d 96 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guzman-Ocampo
See United States v. Salazar-Robles, 207 F.3d 648, 650 (9th Cir.) (opining that a violation of § 1326 requires the general intent to reenter), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 145 , 148 L.Ed.2d 96 (2000); United States v. Martus, 138 F.3d 95, 97 (2d Cir.1998) (holding that government must prove voluntary act of reentry); United States v. Peralt-Reyes, 131 F.3d 956, 957 (11th Cir.1997) (finding no error in instructing jury with a general intent requirement); United States v. Martinez-Morel, 118 F.3d 710, 713 (10th Cir.1997) (holding that the only intent the government must prove is the intent…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowden v. State
See also Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 40 (Fla.)(citing Davis, Court could not conclude that trial court was clearly erroneous because of a lack of proper identification in the record), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 859 , 121 S.Ct. 145 , 148 L.Ed.2d 96 (2000); Hernandez v. State, 686 So.2d 735 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)(reversing because strike should have been permitted; "There is no indication [in the record] that the trial court regarded Mr. Hernandez's explanation [for strike] as disingenuous").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Antonio Rodriguez
v.
Florida
v.
Florida
No. 99-10079.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.