green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Allentown Ambassadors, Inc. v. Northeast American Baseball, LLC (In Re Allentown Ambassadors, Inc.)
Bankr.L.J. at 123; accord, In re Rickel Home Centers, Inc., 209 F.3d 291, 299 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000) ("[t]he Code generally favors free assignability as a means to maximize the value of the debtor’s estate”). 66 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. v. Torchmark Corp.
See Cardtoons, L.C. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass’n, 208 F.3d 885, 889-90 (10th Cir.2000) (en banc) (citing Bill Johnson’s Rests., Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U.S. 731, 742-43 , 103 S.Ct. 2161 , 76 L.Ed.2d 277 (1983)), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Parson v. Portuondo
See Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 111-12 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(3)).
discussed
Cited "see"
O'NEAL v. Lampert
See Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112-113 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000); Miller v. Marr 141 F.3d 976, 978 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 891 , 119 S.Ct. 210 , 142 L.Ed.2d 173 (1998); In Re Dorsainvil, 119 F.3d 245, 248 (3rd Cir.1997); and United States v. Zuno-Arce, 25 F.Supp.2d 1087, 1102 (C.D.Cal.1998), aff'd, 245 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir.2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Penick v. Filion
See Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 113 (2d Cir.2000), cert, denied, - U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Christensen v. Hines
See Lucidore v. New York State Division of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 114 (2d Cir.) (“In order to demonstrate actual innocence in a so-called collateral proceeding, a petitioner must present new reliable evidence that was not presented at trial and show that it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have found [him] guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”) (internal quotations omitted, alteration in original), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000); Felder v. Johnson, 204 F.3d 168, 171 (5th Cir.) (petitioner’s unsupported actual innocence claim does not…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Theokary v. Abbatiello (In Re Theokary)
See, e.g., In re Riekel Home Centers, Inc., 209 F.3d 291, 300 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000); In re 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc., 835 F.2d 427 , 430 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1035 , 108 S.Ct. 1596 , 99 L.Ed.2d 910 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kuenzel v. Allen
See also Lucidore v. New York State Division of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 114 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000), (finding that petitioner failed to demonstrate actual innocence and therefore failing to reach the issue).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Welch v. Mukasey
No certificate of appealability shall issue because Welch has failed to make a “substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2)(“A certificate of ap-pealability may issue ... only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”); see also Lueidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. Ercole
Because petitioner has failed to make a “substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2); see also Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000), a certificate of appealability will not be issued.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. Superintendent, Collins Correctional Facility
No certificate of appealability shall issue because he has failed to make a “substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2)(“A certificate of appealability may issue ... only if the applicant has made a substantial showing *249 of the denial of a constitutional right.”); see also Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.
See, e.g., In re Rickel Home Centers, 240 B.R. 826, 831 (D.Del.1998) (Farnan, J., sitting as bankruptcy court), app. dismissed, 209 F.3d 291 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000). 69 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matias v. Artuz
See, e.g., Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112-13 (2d Cir.) (holding that certificate of appealability properly was granted on issue of "whether AEDPA's statute of limitations violates the Suspension Clause and whether, in order to survive a constitutional challenge, AEDPA must be read to include an 'actual innocence’ exception”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 873 , 121 S.Ct. 175 , 148 L.Ed.2d 120 (2000); Clark v. Stinson, 214 F.3d 315, 319 (2d Cir.2000) (granting certificate of appealability to consider whether AEDPA limitations period violates Suspension Clause), cert. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
L.R.S.C., CO.
v.
RICKEL HOME CENTERS, INC.
v.
RICKEL HOME CENTERS, INC.
No. 00-42.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
121 S. Ct. 175
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.