cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY BROWN See United States v. Ocana, 204 F.3d 585, 591-92 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 192 (2000); United States v. Eastland, 989 F.2d 760, 768-69 (5th Cir. 1993).

cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE LUIS LOREDO See United States v. Ocana, 204 F.3d 585, 588 , cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 192 (2000).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tillery v. Leonard & Sciolla, LLP Subjective determinations such as bad faith are “singularly inappropriate for determination on summary judgment.” Suisman, Shapiro v. Suisman, 2006 WL [387289] at *9, quoting Cadbury Beverages v. Cott Corp., 73 F.3d 474, 483 (2d Cir.1996); see also U.S. ex rel Cantekin v. Univ. of Pittsburgh, 192 F.3d 402 (3d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 880 , 121 S.Ct. 192 , 148 L.Ed.2d 133 (2000) (defendant’s state of mind typically should not be decided on summary judgment).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Favors See, e.g., United States v. Ocana, 204 F.3d 585, 589-90 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 121 S. Ct. 192 (2000) (unlawful conduct within one year was relevant); United States v. Bethley, 973 F.2d 396, 400-401 (5th Cir. 1992) (drug purchases from same source within six months constituted relevant conduct).