green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Chris Boudreau v. Wal-Mart Stores
“A mere scintilla of evidence is inadequate to support a verdict, and judgment as a matter of law is proper when the record contains no proof beyond speculation to support the verdict.” Id. (citation omitted); accord Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1050 (8th Cir.) (“A motion for judgment as a matter of law should be granted if, when considering the evidence in this manner, ‘without weighing the credibility of the witnesses, there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the verdict.’”) (quoting McGreevy v. Daktronics, Inc., 156 F.3d 837, 840 (8th Cir.1998)),…
discussed
Cited "see"
Chris S. Boudreau v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
“A mere scintilla of evidence is inadequate to support a verdict, and judgment as a matter of law is proper when the record contains no proof beyond speculation to support the verdict.” Id. (citation omitted); accord Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1050 (8th Cir.) (“A motion for judgment as a matter of law should be granted if, when considering the evidence in this manner, ‘without weighing’ the credibility of the witnesses, there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the verdict.’ ”) (quoting McGreevy v. Daktronics, Inc., 156 F.3d 837, 840 (8th Cir.199…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Readington Tp. v. Solberg Aviation
See also, Heirs of Guerra v. United States of America, 207 F. 3d 763, 767 (5th Cir.) (holding that "a declaration of taking creates only defeasible title"), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 979 , 121 S.Ct. 428 , 148 L.Ed. 2d 436 (2000); 29A C.J.S.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Magazine Co. v. Murdoch Magazines Distribution, Inc.
See United States Football League v. Nat’l Football League, 842 F.2d 1335 , 1377-79 (2d Cir.1988) (plaintiffs must demonstrate that defendants’ unlawful acts, and not other factors, substantially contributed to their injuries); Intimate Bookshop, 2003 WL 22251312 , at *4-7 (granting summary judgment where plaintiff “provided no evidence, in any form, that defendants’ alleged violation of the Act, as opposed to other intervening market factors, was a material cause of its lost sales and profits”); see also Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1057 (8th Cir.), cert, de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lepage's Incorporated v. 3m (Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company)
See id. at 608 , 105 S.Ct. at 2860 ; see also Eastman Kodak, 504 U.S. at 483 , 112 S.Ct. at 2091 (exclusionary conduct properly is condemned if valid business reasons do not justify conduct that tends to impair the opportunities of a monopolist's rivals or if a valid asserted purpose would be served fully by less restrictive means). 195 On the other hand, in Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1043, 1063 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 979 , 121 S.Ct. 428 , 148 L.Ed.2d 436 (2000), where boat builders brought an antitrust action against a stern drive engine manufacturer, th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Philip Morris Inc.
See, e.g., Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1059 (8th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 979 , 121 S.Ct. 428 , 148 L.Ed.2d 436 (2000) (applying substantial foreclosure test to manufacturer’s discount programs tied to volume purchases); Barry Wright Corp. v. ITT Grinnell Corp., 724 F.2d 227, 236-37 (1st Cir.1983) (applying substantial foreclosure test to partial requirements contract).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lepages Inc v. MN Mining Mfg Co
See id. at 608 , 105 S.Ct. at 2860 ; see also Eastman Kodak, 504 U.S. at 483 , 112 S.Ct. at 2090 (exclusionary conduct properly is condemned if valid business reasons do not justify conduct that tends to impair the opportunities of a monopolist's rivals or if a valid 22 asserted purpose would be served fully by less restrictive means).11 Similarly, in Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1043, 1063 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 979 , 121 S.Ct. 428 (2000), where boat builders brought an antitrust action against a stern drive engine manufacturer, the court held, inter alia,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lepage's Incorporated v. 3m
See id. at 608 , 105 S.Ct. at 2860 ; see also Eastman Kodak, 504 U.S. at 483 , 112 S.Ct. at 2090 (exclusionary conduct properly is condemned if valid business reasons do not justify conduct that tends to impair the opportunities of a monopolist's rivals or if a valid asserted purpose would be served fully by less restrictive means). 11 47 Similarly, in Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp., 207 F.3d 1039, 1043, 1063 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 979 , 121 S.Ct. 428 (2000), where boat builders brought an antitrust action against a stern drive engine manufacturer, the court held, inter alia…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gaylor
v.
West Virginia
v.
West Virginia
No. 00-395.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 2000.
Published
Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.