green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
“state-court petition ... that is filed following the expiration of the limitations period cannot toll that period because there is no period remaining to be tolled”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Curiel v. Fleker
state-court petition ... that is filed following the expiration of the limitations period cannot toll that period because there is no period remaining to be tolled
discussed
Cited "see"
Hamilton v. Secretary, DOC
See Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir.) (per curiam) (finding that even properly filed state-court petitions must be pending in order to toll the limitations period, and that a state court petition that is filed “following the expiration of the limitations period cannot toll that period because there is no period remaining to be tolled”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pedro Luis Christopher Tinoco
See United States v. Krilich, 209 F.3d 968, 972 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 992 , 121 S.Ct. 482 , 148 L.Ed.2d 455 (2000) (discussing such elements).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Quezada
(2×)
See United States v. Percy, 250 F.3d 720, 728 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 493 , 151 L.Ed.2d 405 (2001) (reviewing for plain error when defendant did not object at trial to prosecutor’s asserted misconduct and stating that plain error is one that affects substantial rights). . 206 F.3d 882 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 455 (2000). . 222 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir.2000). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Casey Bridges v. Curtis Johnson
See Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir.) (holding that a state court petition filed after the expiration of the AEDPA’s one-year limitations period cannot toll that period “because there is no period remaining to be tolled”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rueth Development Co.
See United States v. Krilich, 209 F.3d 968, 972 (7th Cir.2000) (“[T]he interstate connection, i.e. that the waters involved were ‘waters of the United States,’ is merely an element of the United States’ Clean Water Act case under section 301.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 992 , 121 S.Ct. 482 , 148 L.Ed.2d 455 (2000); see also United States v. Wilson, 133 F.3d 251, 264 (4th Cir.1997) (indicating proof of interstate nexus is an element of criminal liability under CWA); United States v. Ahmad, 101 F.3d 386, 391 (5th Cir.1996) (recognizing the existence of “purely jurisdictional elements�…
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Randle
See Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Owens v. Stine
See Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Winters v. Edwards
See Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alejandro Bustos De La Pava
(2×)
See United States v. Page, 232 F.3d 536, 540-41 (6th Cir. 2000) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 2202 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1032 ; United States v. Cordoba- Mosquera, 212 F.3d 1194, 1195-96 (11th Cir.2000) (per curiam), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1131 , 121 S.Ct. 893 , 148 L.Ed.2d 800 (2001); Nai Fook Li, 206 F.3d at 61-62 ; see also United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 206 F.3d 882, 887-88 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) (holding that the failure to comply with Article 36(l)(b) did not warrant exclusion of post-arrest statements made by a foreign detainee to the prosecution), cer t. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 12…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lombera-Camorlinga
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-9927.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 2000.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.