green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Felix Rocha v. Rick Thaler, Director
See Barrientes v. Johnson, 221 F.3d 741 , 759 n. 10 (5th Cir.2000) ("We treat article 11.071 as a codification of the Texas abuse-of-the-writ doctrine.” (citing Ex parte Smith, 977 S.W.2d 610 , 611 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1998))), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1134 , 121 S.Ct. 902 , 148 L.Ed.2d 948 (2001); see also Ex parte Keir, 64 S.W.3d 414 , 418 n. 11 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) ("[T]his Court had long ago recognized the jurisprudential problems attendant to multiple writ filings and hinted of judicial invocation of the 'abuse of the writ' doctrine ....
discussed
Cited "see"
Jennings v. Everett
See Barrientes v. Johnson, 221 F.3d 741, 772 (5th Cir.2000) (“[T]he determination of whether a COA should issue must be made by viewing the petitioner’s arguments through the lens of the deferential scheme laid out in 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d).”), cert, dismissed, 531 U.S. 1134 , 121 S.Ct. 902 , 148 L.Ed.2d 948 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coulson v. Johnson
(2×)
See Robison v. Johnson, 151 F.3d 256, 268 (5th Cir. 1998) (stating that the petitioner “must still show that the district court abused its discretion in denying the hearing”); see also Barrientes v. Johnson, 221 F.3d 741, 761 (5th Cir. 2000) (quoting in agreement a prior unpublished opinion in that case for the proposition that “‘a habeas petitioner fails to exhaust state remedies when he presents additional factual allegations and evidentiary support to the federal court that was not presented to the state court’”), cert. dism’d by 121 S. Ct. 902 (2001); Joyner v. King, 786 F.2d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barrientes
v.
Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
No. 00-7523.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 7, 2001.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.