Moldo v. Matsco, Inc., 122 S. Ct. 1069 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Moldo v. Matsco, Inc., 122 S. Ct. 1069 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
109 citation events (109 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Braunstein v. Gateway Management Services Ltd. (In Re Coldwave Systems, LLC) (mab, 2007-05-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Braunstein v. Gateway Management Services Ltd. (In Re Coldwave Systems, LLC) (3×)
Bankr. D. Mass. · 2007 · confidence medium
The court noted that, although it described the governing state law as “Article 9, it meant only the California version of the Uniform Commercial Code.” Id. at 1045. 22 .Id. at 1045-46 (citations and internal quotes omitted in this and the following two footnotes). 23 .
discussed Cited "see" McMahon v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. McMahon, 257 Conn. 544 , 778 A.2d 847 (2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1130 , 122 S. Ct. 1069 , 151 L.
cited Cited "see" Electrical Constructors, LLP v. Tower Tech, Inc.
10th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 1056-58.
discussed Cited "see" Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
Because this fundamental right is not absolute, it can be invaded upon enactment of a statute that is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest." Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 302 , 113 S.Ct. 1439, 1447 , 123 L.Ed.2d 1, 16 (1993); see Department of Transp. v. Rowe, 353 N.C. 671, 676 , 549 S.E.2d 203, 208 (2001) (strict scrutiny triggered by infringement of fundamental right), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 1070 , 151 L.Ed.2d 972 , 70 U.S.L.W. 3395 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Terwilliger (2×)
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. McMahon, 257 Conn. 544 , 552–56, 778 A.2d 847 (2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1130 , 122 S. Ct. 1069 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Broderick v. Broderick
N.C. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Dep't of Transp. v. Rowe, 353 N.C. 671 , 674, 549 S.E.2d 203 , 207 (2001) (alleged error "not properly presented" to this Court where plaintiff failed to comply with "Rule 10(c) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure [which] requires that an appellant state the legal basis for all assignments of error"), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1130 , 122 S.Ct. 1070 , 151 L.Ed.2d 972 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Georgia Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., TruServ Corp. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 1105, 1119 (D.C.Cir.2001) (holding that an employer “was not free to replace unilaterally the contractual grievance procedure”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1130 , 122 S.Ct. 1070 , 151 L.Ed.2d 972 (2002).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Toomer v. Garrett
N.C. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Dept. of Transportation v. Rowe, 353 N.C. 671 , 549 S.E.2d 203 (2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1130 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Luurtsema (2×)
Conn. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. McMahon, 257 Conn. 544, 552 , 778 A.2d 847 (2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1130 , 122 S. Ct. 1069 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Augur v. Augur
N.C. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Department of Transp. v. Rowe, 353 N.C. 671, 678 , 549 S.E.2d 203, 209 (2001) (federal Due Process Clause caselaw persuasive but not controlling when analyzing the North Carolina Constitution), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1130 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rhone-Poulenc Agro, S.A. (Now Known as Aventis Cropscience Sa) v. Dekalb Genetics Corporation v. Monsanto Company (Now Known as Pharmacia Corporation) (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Moldo v. Matsco, Inc. (In re Cybernetic Servs., Inc.), 252 F.3d 1039, 1051 (9th Cir.2001) (In section 261 “Congress ... intended to refer to ownership interests only.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1069 , 151 L.Ed.2d 972 (U.S.2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Byron MOLDO, Chapter 7 Trustee, Estate of Cybernetic Services, Inc., dba Silent Radio, Inc.
v.
MATSCO, INC., and Matsco Financial Corporation
No. 01-810.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 2002.
122 S. Ct. 1069
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.