green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mares
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 517 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1150 , 122 S.Ct. 1113 , 151 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2002); United States v. Gresham, 118 F.3d 258, 264-65 (5th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 702 , 139 L.Ed.2d 645 (1998); United States v. Kuban, 94 F.3d 971, 973 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1070 , 117 S.Ct. 716 , 136 L.Ed.2d 635 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Valencia
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), ce rt. denied, 534 U.S. 1150 , 122 S.Ct. 1113 , 151 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Florence
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), ce rt. denied, 534 U.S. 1150 , 122 S.Ct. 1113 , 151 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tillis
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1150 , 122 S.Ct. 1113 , 151 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2002); United States v. Gresham, 118 F.3d 258, 264-65 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Fitzhugh, 984 F.2d 143, 145-46 (5th Cir.1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Flores-Barrera
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied 534 U.S. 1150 , 122 S.Ct. 1113 , 151 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stamps
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513 , 518 & n.12 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalez
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002); United States v. Kuban, 94 F.3d 971, 973 (5th Cir. 1996); and United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242-43 (5th Cir. 1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hubert
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513 , 518 & n.12 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Faulkner
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002); United States v. Gresham, 118 F.3d 258 , 264- 65 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Kuban, 94 F.3d 971, 973 (5th Cir. 1996); and United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242-43 (5th Cir. 1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richardson
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513 , 518 & n.12 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002); United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Turk
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kerr
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Greer
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. White
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513 , 518 & n.12 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002); United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Omowale
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513 , 518 & n.12 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002); United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cornish
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RON CAGE
See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513 , 518 & n.12 (holding that “constitutionality of § 922(g) is not open to question” and that evidence that a weapon was manufactured outside of the state in which it was possessed is sufficient to support a conviction) (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1113 (2002); United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999) (refusing instruction that required proof that ammunition had an “explicit connection or substantial effect on” interstate commerce).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cavazos
See e.g., United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 1113 , 151 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2002) (A sufficient interstate commerce nexus exists where the weapon was manufactured in Egypt, imported through Tennessee, but possessed in Texas); United States v. Kuban, 94 F.3d 971 (5th Cir.1996) (same where the weapon was manufactured in Belgium but possessed in Texas); United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240 (5th Cir.1996) (same where the weapon *713 was manufactured in Massachusetts but possessed in Texas.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aceves-Tello
v.
United States Garcia-Mariscal, aka Antonio Garcia v. United States Enriquez-Villa, aka Enriquez v. United States Garcia-Parra v. United States Martinez-Arroyo, aka Martinez v. United States Piedra-Ojeda v. United States Salinas-Cano v. United States and Urbina-Perez v. United States
v.
United States Garcia-Mariscal, aka Antonio Garcia v. United States Enriquez-Villa, aka Enriquez v. United States Garcia-Parra v. United States Martinez-Arroyo, aka Martinez v. United States Piedra-Ojeda v. United States Salinas-Cano v. United States and Urbina-Perez v. United States
No. 01-7527.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 2002.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F. 3d 1102 (fifth and eighth judgments) and 1103 (first, second, third, fourth, sixth, and seventh judgments).