Enos v. Texas, 534 U.S. 1094 (2002). · Go Syfert
Enos v. Texas, 534 U.S. 1094 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“unless a defendant has made a timely motion for a cautionary instruction or for a mistrial, we will not consider his assignments of error alleging that improper remarks were made by the prosecutor.”
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Andrews v. Com. (va, 2010-09-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Andrews v. Com.
Va. · 2010 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
unless a defendant has made a timely motion for a cautionary instruction or for a mistrial, we will not consider his assignments of error alleging that improper remarks were made by the prosecutor.
discussed Cited "see" Martinez v. Commonwealth
Va. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schmitt v. Commonwealth, 262 Va. 127, 143 , 547 S.E.2d 186, 197-98 (2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1094 , 122 S.Ct. 840 , 151 L.Ed.2d 719 (2002) (finding the evidence sufficient to prove premeditation where the accused entered the bank with a concealed, loaded gun, approached the victim, and then shot him from close range); Bailey v. Commonwealth, 259 Va. 723, 749 , 529 S.E.2d 570, 585 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 995 , 121 S.Ct. 488 , 148 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000) (finding sufficient evidence of premeditation where the accused walked into a bedroom and shot the victim “twice in the head at close ra…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arrington v. Commonwealth
Va. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Schmitt v. Commonwealth, 262 Va. 127, 146 , 547 S.E.2d 186, 199 (2001) (argument regarding admissibility of tape recording waived because appellant failed to comply with statutory requirements of Code § 19.2-266.2), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1094 , 122 S.Ct. 840 , 151 L.Ed.2d 719 (2002); Johnson v. Commonwealth, 37 Va.App. 634, 644-45 , 561 S.E.2d 1, 6 (2002) (constitutionality of a code section not preserved for appeal because appellant failed to comply with Code § 19.2-266.2); Morrison v. Commonwealth, 37 Va.App. 273, 279 , 557 S.E.2d 724, 727 (2002) (Court refusing to address cons…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Juniper v. Com.
Va. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
As we have previously stated, "[t]he standard to be applied by a trial court in deciding whether to exclude or retain a prospective juror is whether the prospective juror's views `would prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'" Breard, 248 Va. at 77 , 445 S.E.2d at 676 (quoting Eaton v. Commonwealth, 240 Va. 236 , 246, 397 S.E.2d 385 , 391 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 824 , 112 S.Ct. 88 , 116 L.Ed.2d 60 (1991)); see also Schmitt v. Commonwealth, 262 Va. 127 , 139-41, 547 S.E.2d 186 , 195-96 (2001), cert. denie…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Enos
v.
Texas
No. 01-7023.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 2002.
534 U.S. 1094

Ct. App. Tex., 2d Dist. Certio-rari denied.