Stringham v. Titsworth, 542 U.S. 939 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Stringham v. Titsworth, 542 U.S. 939 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“n title vii cases, the existence of an employer-employee relationship is a question of federal law____”
22 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Murphy-Taylor v. Hofmann (mdd, 2013-09-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Murphy-Taylor v. Hofmann
D. Maryland · 2013 · signal: accord · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
n title vii cases, the existence of an employer-employee relationship is a question of federal law____
discussed Cited "see" Raich v. Gonzales (2×)
9th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ashcroft v. Raich, 542 U.S. 936 , 124 S.Ct. 2909 , 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stringham
v.
Titsworth
03-9922.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2004.
542 U.S. 939
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: D. Maryland (1)

542 U.S. 939

STRINGHAM ET AL.
v.
TITSWORTH ET AL.

No. 03-9922.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 28, 2004.

1

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 88 Fed. Appx. 7.