Hendricks v. Mut. Indem. (Bermuda), Ltd., 546 U.S. 976 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Hendricks v. Mut. Indem. (Bermuda), Ltd., 546 U.S. 976 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
53 citation events (53 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: ROLER v. State (indctapp, 2006-12-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) ROLER v. State
Ind. Ct. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
In Smylie v. State, 823 N.E.2d 679 (Ind. 2005), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 545 (2005), our Indiana Supreme Court held Blakely applies to Indiana's sentencing scheme, and thus requires "the sort of facts envisioned by Blakely as necessitating a jury finding must be found by a jury under Indiana's existing sentencing laws." Id. at 686.
discussed Cited "see" Luhrsen v. State
Ind. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smylie v. State, 823 N.E.2d 679, 686 (Ind.2005) (“When sentencing a defendant on multiple counts, an Indiana trial judge may impose a consecutive sentence if he or she finds at least one aggravator.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 545 , 163 L.Ed.2d 459 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Tanner (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smylie v. State, 823 N.E.2d 679 (Ind), cert. den., ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 545 , 163 L.Ed.2d 459 (2005) (judicial factfinding of aggravating factor required to impose consecutive sentence did not violate Sixth Amendment because the consecutive sentences did not exceed statutory maximums for the offenses); People v. Murray, 785 N.Y.S.2d 675 , 5 Misc.3d 636 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. 2004) (judicial finding that the defendant formed new intent in committing second crime did not violate Apprendi because "no single sentence exceeds the statutorily authorized maximum sentence"); People v. Groves, 107 Cal.App…
cited Cited "see" French v. State
Ind. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smylie v. State, 823 N.E.2d 679, 686 (Ind.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 545 , 163 L.Ed.2d 459 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wiley Jones v. State of Indiana
Ind. Ct. App. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
See generally Fix, 186 N.E.3d at 1144 (holding that whether certain offenses constitute a single episode of criminal conduct is a fact- intensive inquiry determined by the trial court); see also Estes v. State, 827 N.E.2d 27, 29 (Ind. 2005) (holding that “a court’s authority to order consecutive sentences was not affected by Blakely”) (citing Smylie v. State, 823 N.E.2d 679, 686 (Ind. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 976 , 126 S. Ct. 545 (2005)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hendricks et vir
v.
Mutual Indemnity (Bermuda), Ltd.
No. 04-1699.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 2005.
546 U.S. 976
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.