green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
15.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2010 · 2 courts ·
…we must have regard to all the words used by congress, and as far as possible give effect to them.
at p. 1444
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Northeast Hospital Corporation v. Johnson
we must have regard to all the words used by congress, and as far as possible give effect to them.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Johns v. Holder
rjepeals by implication are not favored and will not be presumed unless the intention of the legislature to repeal is clear and manifest.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pennsylvania v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
we must have regard to all the words used by congress, and as far as possible give effect to them.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Obligation of Federal Agencies to Pay Stormwater Assessments Under the Clean Water Act
A. Although “[s]tatutory construction is a holistic endeavor,” Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh, 543 U.S. 50, 60 (2004) (internal quotation marks omitted), our analysis of the Stormwater Amendment, “begin[s], as always, with the text of the statute.” Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 129 S. Ct. 1436, 1443 (2009).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sai v. Obama
See Apology Resolution; 20 U.S.C. § 7512 (5); Hawaii v. Off. of Hawaiian Affairs, 129 S. Ct. 1436, 1440-41 (2009).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Reimbursement or Payment Obligation of the Federal Government Under Section 313(c)(2)(b) of the Clean Water Act
Although we recognize the importance of this question, it lies beyond the scope of EPA’s request, which is focused on section 313(c)(2)(B). 5 Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel in Volume 35 A. Although “[s]tatutory construction is a holistic endeavor,” Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh, 543 U.S. 50, 60 (2004) (internal quotation marks omitted), our analysis of the Stormwater Amendment, “begin[s], as always, with the text of the statute.” Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 129 S. Ct. 1436, 1443 (2009).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
MDY INDUSTRIES, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment
Text of the operative provisions “We begin, as always, with the text of the statute.” Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 129 S. Ct. 1436, 1443 (2009) (quoting Permanent Mission of India to United Nations v. City of New York, 551 U.S. 193, 197 (2007)).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Applicability of Tax Levies to Thrift Savings Plan Accounts
(3×)
But “re- peals by implication are not favored and will not be presumed unless the intention of the legislature to repeal is clear and manifest.” Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 129 S. Ct. 1436, 1445 (2009) (internal quota- tion marks and brackets omitted)).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Applicability of Tax Levies Under 26 U.S.C. § 6334 to Thrift Savings Plan Accounts
(3×)
But “repeals by implication are not favored and will not be presumed unless the intention of the legislature to repeal is clear and manifest.” Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 129 S. Ct. 1436, 1445 (2009) (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gonzalez v. Google, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Hawaii , 556 U.S. at 175 , 129 S.Ct. 1436 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Kenneth Salazar
See Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 556 U.S. 163, 175 , 129 S.Ct. 1436 , 173 L.Ed.2d 333 (2009) (“[W]here the text of a clause itself indicates that it does not have operative effect...., a court has no license to make it do what it was not designed to do.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Gaylord
See Williams v. Philip Morris, 344 Or 45 , 176 P3d 1255 (2008), cert dismissed as improvidently granted, 556 US 178 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Ganess Maharaj
As a general matter, “ ‘repeals by implication are not favored,’ and therefore, ‘the intention of the legislature to repeal must be clear and manifest.’ ” The Last Best Beef, LLC v. Dudas, 506 F.3d 333, 338 (4th Cir.2007) (quoting TVA v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153, 189 , 98 S.Ct. 2279 , 57 L.Ed.2d 117 (1978)); see Hui v. Castaneda, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1845, 1853 , 176 L.Ed.2d 703 (2010) (“As we have empha *571 sized, repeals by implication are not favored and will not be presumed unless the intention of the legislature to repeal is clear and manifest.” (quoting Hawaii v. Office of Ha…
cited
Cited "see"
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston v. Seger-Thomschitz
See Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1436, 1443 , 173 L.Ed.2d 333 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Northeast Hospital Corp. v. Sebelius
See Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, - U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 1436, 1444 , 173 L.Ed.2d 333 (2009) ("We must have regard to all the words used by Congress, and as far as possible give effect to them.”). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Joliet, Ill. v. New West, LP
See Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1436, 1444-45 , 173 L.Ed.2d 333 (2009) (37 “whereas” clauses setting out congressional findings and reasons for adopting a joint resolution do not have any effect independent of the resolution’s two operative clauses).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Clay
See also id. at 171-172, 129 S.Ct. 1436 (the court can consider information learned about the crime after the plea offer). {¶ 18} In the Frye case, the prosecutor sent the defendant's attorney a letter offering two possible plea bargains; one would reduce the felony charge to a misdemeanor and recommend a sentence of 90 days in jail.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Steven Hammer v. Sam's East, Inc.
See, e.g., Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 556 U.S. 163, 173 , 129 S.Ct. 1436 , 173 L.Ed.2d 333 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 556 U.S. 163 , 129 S.Ct. 1436, 1443 , 173 L.Ed.2d 333 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Philip Morris USA Inc.
v.
Williams
v.
Williams
07-1216.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 2009.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · M.D. Pennsylvania (1)
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 556 U. S. ____ (2009) 1
Per Curiam
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________
No. 07–1216 _________________
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., PETITIONER v. MAYOLA
WILLIAMS, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ES-
TATE OF JESSE D. WILLIAMS, DECEASED
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON
[March 31, 2009]
PER CURIAM. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered.