Sainez v. Venables, 177 L. Ed. 2d 312 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Sainez v. Venables, 177 L. Ed. 2d 312 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Craig (minnctapp, 2011-12-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Craig
Minn. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rozier, 598 F.3d 768, 770 (11th Cir.2010) (declining to apply any level of scrutiny and determining the federal felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1) (2006), to be constitutional, “even if a felon possesses a firearm purely for self-defense”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3399 , 177 L.Ed.2d 313 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. DeCiccio
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
These prohibitions have been characterized as ‘‘exceptions to the right to bear arms.’’ United States v. Marzzarella, supra, 614 F.3d 91 ; see also United States v. Rozier, 598 F.3d 768, 771 (11th Cir.) (concluding that felons are ‘‘disqualified from the exercise of [s]econd [a]mendment rights [under Heller]’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 560 U.S. 958 , 130 S. Ct. 3399 , 177 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. R.P.H.
Wash. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Thus, virtually all have upheld laws prohibiting the possession of firearms by felons without subjecting them to some level of means-end scrutiny on the ground that “felons are categorically different from the individuals who have a fundamental right to bear arms.” United States v. Vongxay, 594 F.3d 1111, 1115 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 294 (2010); see also United States v. Rozier, 598 F.3d 768, 771 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3399 (2010). ¶42 Although RCW 9.41.040(4) appears to fall squarely within the category of “presumptively lawful” firearm prohibitions, R.P.H…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Marzzarella
3rd Cir. · 2010 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Scroggins, 599 F.3d 433, 451 (5th Cir.2010) (characterizing this language as dicta), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. June 1, 2010) (09-11204), and United States v. McCane, 573 F.3d 1037, 1047 (10th Cir.2009) (Tymkovich, J., dissenting) (same), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010) with United States v. Rozier, 598 F.3d 768 , 771 n. 6 (11th Cir.2010) (stating this language is not dicta), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3399 , 177 L.Ed.2d 313 (2010), and United States v. Vongxay, 594 F.3d 1111, 1115 (9th Cir.2010) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aldo Omar Crotte Sainez
v.
George Venables
No. 09-10589.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 2010.
177 L. Ed. 2d 312
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 588 F.3d 713.