Castle v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2941 (2015). · Go Syfert
Castle v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2941 (2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (44 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Jason Castle (ca6, 2015-08-31)
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Jason Castle
6th Cir. · 2015 · confidence medium
Johnson, 135 S.Ct. at 2563 (“Today’s decision [that the residual clause of § 924(e)(2)(B) is unconstitutional] does not call into question application of the Act to the four enumerated offenses,' or the remainder of the Act’s definition of a violent felony,”).
discussed Cited "see" Jones v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections (2×)
11th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zink v. Lombardi, 783 F.3d 1089, 1109 (8th Cir.2015), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2941 , 192 L.Ed.2d 976 (2015) (“We agree with the Eleventh and Fifth Circuits that the Constitution does not require such disclosure.
discussed Cited "see" Jones v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections (2×)
11th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zink v. Lombardi, 783 F.3d 1089, 1109 (8th Cir.2015), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2941 , 192 L.Ed.2d 976 (2015) (‘We agree with the Eleventh and Fifth Circuits that the Constitution does not require such disclosure.
cited Cited "see" Zink v. Lombardi
W.D. Mo. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zink v. Lombardi, 783 F.3d 1089 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2941 , 192 L.Ed.2d 976 (2015).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jason CASTLE
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 14–9108..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 30, 2015.
135 S. Ct. 2941
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisand petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2551, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2015).

Justice ALITOconcurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case: Following the recommendation of the Solicitor General, the Court has held the petition in this and many other cases pending the decision in Johnson v. United States,576 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2551, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2015). In holding this petition and now in vacating and remanding the decision below in this case, the Court has not differentiated between cases in which the petitioner would be entitled to relief if the Court held (as it now has) that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), is void for vagueness and cases in which relief would not be warranted for a procedural reason. On remand, the Court of Appeals should understand that the Court's disposition of this petition does not reflect any view regarding petitioner's entitlement to relief.