Bank of Am. Corp. v. Gelboim, 137 S. Ct. 814 (2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Bank of Am. Corp. v. Gelboim, 137 S. Ct. 814 (2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“implicit in the inquiry is recognition that not every victim of an antitrust violation needs to be compensated under the antitrust laws in order for the antitrust laws to be efficiently enforced.”
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Winters v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. (dcd, 2017-10-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Winters v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.
D.D.C. · 2017 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
implicit in the inquiry is recognition that not every victim of an antitrust violation needs to be compensated under the antitrust laws in order for the antitrust laws to be efficiently enforced.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tremont Public Advisors, LLC v. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority
Conn. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
Even a plaintiff that has suffered an antitrust injury must also demonstrate that it is a suitable plaintiff, i.e., an efficient enforcer of the antitrust laws.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 157–58; see also Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp., 823 F.3d 759, 770 (2d Cir. 2016) (‘‘[a]n antitrust plaintiff must show both constitutional standing and antitrust stand- ing’’), cert. denied, U.S. , 137 S. Ct. 814 , 196 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
v.
Ellen GELBOIM
No. 16–545..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 2017.
137 S. Ct. 814
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.