Pennsylvania v. West Virginia, 263 U.S. 350 (1923). · Go Syfert
Search
Pennsylvania v. West Virginia, 263 U.S. 350 (1923). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tracie Park v. Forest Service of the United States of America (ca8, 2000-03-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1922 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1922 1974 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Tracie Park v. Forest Service of the United States of America (2×)
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 101-05 , 103 S.Ct. 1660 , 75 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983). “[I]t is the plaintiffs burden to establish standing by demonstrating that, if unchecked by the litigation, the defendant’s allegedly wrongful behavior will likely occur or continue, and that the ‘threatened injury [is] “certainly impending .” ’ ” Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc., — U.S. -, -, 120 S.Ct. 693, 709 , 145 L.Ed.2d 610 (2000), quoting Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 158 , 110 S.Ct. 1717 , 109 L.Ed.2d 135 (1990), itself quoting Pennsylv…
cited Cited "see" Aberly v. Craven County
4th Cir. · 1934 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hightower v. American National Bank, 263 U. S. 351 , 44 S. Ct. 123, 68 , L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
State of West Virginia; State of Ohio v. State of West Virginia
Nos. 15 and 16, Original, of the Last Term.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1923.
263 U.S. 350
Mr. John W. Davis and Mr. George E. Alter, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, for plaintiffs., Mr. Philip, P. Steptoe and Mr. George M. Hoffheimer for defendant.
Van Devanter, Holmes, McReynolds, Brandéis.
Cited by 18 opinions  |  Published
Mr. Justice Van Devanter

announced the ruling of. the Court.

An opinion expressing the views of the Court in these cases was announced at the ’last term and a decree was entered then. 262 U. S. 553, 623. - By the Court’s leave, given at that term, a petition for rehearing was filed. The cases had been presented in oral argument three times, but three members of the Court had heard only the last presentation. This, with the importance of the questions involved and the public character of; the litigants, led the Court to grant the rehearing. It was had. two weeks ago.. The cases have been considered again in the light of that presentation, and after this further reflection the Court perceives no ground for disturbing the[*351] opinion heretofore announced or the decree entered thereon.

Decree reaffirmed.

The Chief Justice did not participate in the consideration of the cases on the rehearing. Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice McReynolds and Mr. Justice Brandéis dissent, for the reasons given in their dissenting opinions at the last term.