green
Positive treatment
9.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1928 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1928
1977
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Democratic Party of United States v. National Conservative Political Action Committee
(2×)
But cf. Yaselli v. Goff, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927), aff’g, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir.1926) (giving absolute immunity to federal prosecutors). 18 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Filipiak
The out of state cases cited as supporting this proposition are In re Jones (1943), 202 La. 729 , 12 So. 2d 795 ; In re Meraux (1943), 202 La. 736 , 12 So. 2d 798 ; State Bar of Calif. v. Superior Court (1929), 207 Cal. 323 , 278 Pac. 432 ; In re Silkman, 88 App. Div. 102 , 84 NYS. 1025; Baird v. Justice’s Court, 11 Cal. App. 439 , 105 Pac. 259 ; In re McGarry (1942), 380 Ill. 359 , 44 N. E. 2d 7 ; Berry v. Smith (1927), 148 Va. 424 , 139 S. E. 252 , 55 A.L.R. 279 ; Yaselli v. Goff, 2 Cir. 12 Fed. 2d 396, 275 U. S. 503 , 48 S. C. 155, 72 L.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Nadeau v. Marchessault
R. 1239, 1244 et seq., aff. 275 U. S. 503 , 48 Sup. Ct. 155, 72 L.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Norton v. Hoffmann
R. 1239] (affirmed in 275 U. S. 503 [48 Sup. Ct. 155, 72 L.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Davis v. Burris
R. 1239, 1244 (affirmed in 275 U. S. 503 , 48 Sup. Ct. 155, 72 L.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
White v. Brinkman
R. 1239], affirmed in 275 U. S. 503 [48 Sup. Ct. 155, 72 L.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Pearson v. Reed
R. 1239] (affirmed in 275 U. S. 503 [48 Sup. Ct. 155, 72 L.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Merchants' National Bank v. Dawson County
We are not at liberty to indulge in the speculation that, because of the reversal of the decision of this court by the memorandum opinion in 275 U. S. 502 , 48 Sup. Ct. Rep. 155, 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gill v. Ripley
(2×)
See Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir.1926), aff'd, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927); Munster v. Lamb, 11 Q.B.D. 588 (1883); Hayslip v. Wellford, 195 Tenn. 621 , 263 S.W.2d 136 , cert. denied, 346 U.S. 911 , 74 S.Ct. 243 , 98 L.Ed. 408 (1953); Griffith v. Slinkard, 146 Ind. 117 , 44 N.E. 1001 (1896); Engelke v. Chouteau, 98 Mo. 629 , 12 S.W. 358 (1889); Turpen v. Booth, 56 Cal. 65 (1880); Hunter v. Mathis, 40 Ind. 356 (1872); T.
discussed
Cited "see"
Muzzy v. State
(2×)
See Yaselli v. Goff 12 F.2d 396, 402 (2d Cir.1926), aff'd, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927).
cited
Cited "see"
Bear Creek Development Corp. v. Dyer
Accord Komposh v. Powers, 75 Mont. 493 , 244 P. 298 (1926), aff'd, 275 U.S. 504 , 48 S.Ct. 156 , 72 L.Ed. 396 (1927); State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Willie D. White v. Richard Frank, Freeman Marshall, City of Poughkeepsie
(2×)
See Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir.1926), aff'd, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hobson v. Wilson
(2×)
See Yaselli v. Goff, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927) (citing Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 335, 347 , 20 L.Ed. 646 (1871) and Alzua v. Johnson, 231 U.S. 106, 111 , 34 S.Ct. 27, 29 , 58 L.Ed. 142 (1913)). .
discussed
Cited "see"
John Larry Ray v. Patricia Pickett, J. Alan MacDoniel U.S. Parole Commissioner
(2×)
See Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir.1926), aff'd, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crisp v. City of Alcoa
(2×)
See Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396, 403 (2nd Cir.1926), aff’d 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927); Myers v. Bull, 599 F.2d 863, 866 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 901 , 100 S.Ct. 213 , 62 L.Ed.2d 138 ; Borg v. Boas, 231 F.2d 788 , (9th Cir.1956); Lofland v. Meyers, 442 F.Supp. 955, at 959 (S.D.N.Y.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gray v. Bell
(2×)
See Yaselli v. Goff, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927), aff’g per curiam 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1926).
discussed
Cited "see"
Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, Norman Scott v. Smithsonian Institution
(2×)
See text at n. 34, supra. In addition, in the law review article cited to accompany the last sentence of footnote 4, Professor Jaffe was discussing official immunity in general, with particular attention to this country. . 420 U.S. at 318 , 95 S.Ct. at 999 . . 386 U.S. at 547 , 87 S.Ct. 1213 . . 424 U.S. at 422 , 96 S.Ct. 984 . . 12 F.2d 396 , aff’d, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927) (per curiam). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. Cauthen
(2×)
See Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1926), aff’d, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 , and discussed at length in Gregoire v. Biddle, supra. Thus, since the crux of plaintiff’s complaint concents Hannon’s official duties, plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against defendant Hannon.
examined
Cited "see"
Ingo v. Koch
(4×)
See Yaselli v. Goff, 2 Cir., 12 F.2d 396 , 56 A.L.R. 1239 , affirmed 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 , and cases there cited.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bianchi v. McQueen
(2×)
See, e.g., Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396, 401-02 (2d Cir.1926), summarily aff'd, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927) [additional citations omitted].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simmons v. Fabian
(2×)
Compare Imbler, 424 U.S. at 421-22 , 96 S.Ct. at 990 -91 (citing Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir.1926) (granting federal prosecutor absolute quasi-judicial immunity from damages), aff'd, 275 U.S. 503, 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927) (per curiam)), with Young, 209 U.S. at 159 , 28 S.Ct. at 453 (enjoining state attorney general).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 90-6051
(2×)
See, e.g., Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396, 400-02 (2d Cir.1926), summarily aff'd, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schrob v. Catterson
(2×)
See, e.g., Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396, 400-02 (2d Cir.1926), summarily aff'd, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harry Robinson and Kay Robinson, Eva May McCarthy and George Samuel Robinson v. Volkswagenwerk Ag, Greer & Greer, and Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C.
(2×)
See, e.g., Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396, 401-402 (CA2 1926), summarily aff'd, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927); Youmans v. Smith, 153 N.Y. 214, 219-220 , 47 N.E. 265 (1897); Griffith v. Slinkard, 146 Ind. 117, 122 , 44 N.E. 1001, 1002 (1896); Marsh v. Ellsworth, 50 N.Y. 309, 312-313 (1872); Jennings v. Paine, 4 Wis. 358 (1855); Hoar v. Wood, 44 Mass. 193, 197-198 (1841).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. Volkswagenwerk AG
(2×)
See, e.g., Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396, 401-402 (CA2 1926), summarily aff’d, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927); Youmans v. Smith, 153 N.Y. 214, 219-220 , 47 N.E. 265 (1897); Griffith v. Stinkard, 146 Ind. 117, 122 , 44 N.E. 1001, 1002 (1896); Marsh v. Ellsworth, 50 N.Y. 309, 312-313 (1872); Jennings v. Paine, 4 Wis. 358 (1855); Hoar v. Wood, 44 Mass. 193, 197-198 (1841).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Stephen Buckley, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. J. Michael Fitzsimmons, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
(4×)
See also Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir.1926), affirmed, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooney v. Park County
(4×)
See also Yaselli v. Goff, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dr. Earl Evans v. W.H. \Sonny\" Dillahunty and William E. Amos
(2×)
See also Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir.1926), affirmed without opinion, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martinez v. Winner
(2×)
See also Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1926), affirmed 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1928).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferri v. Rossetti
(4×)
See e. g., Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396, 406 (2d Cir. 1926), aff’d per curiam, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. Lutcher
(2×)
See also Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1926), aff’d per curiam, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John J. McClellan
(2×)
Compare cited by the Court, Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396, 406 (CA2, 1926), affirmed 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927); Gregoire v. Biddle, 177 F.2d 579, 581 (CA2, 1949), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 949 , 70 S.Ct. 803 , 94 L.Ed. 1363 (1950).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cashen v. Spann
(2×)
See, e. g., Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F. 2d 396, 404 (2 Cir. 1926), aff’d per curiam, 275 U. S. 503 , 48 S. Ct. 155 , 72 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1974
(2×)
See, e.g., Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1926), aff'd per curiam, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927). 6 However, the same protection has not been available when a claim under civil rights legislation focuses on a prosecutor's actions in the course of directing police investigative activity.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Apton v. Wilson
(2×)
See, e. g., Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1926), aff’d per curiam, 275 U.S. 503 , 48 S.Ct. 155 , 72 L.Ed. 395 (1927). 6 However, the same protection has not been available when a claim under civil rights legislation focuses on a prosecutor’s actions in the course of directing police investigative activity.
Standard Oil Company and Claude E. Shamp
v.
City of Lincoln
v.
City of Lincoln
No. 91.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1927.
Messrs. Wm. H. Herdman and L. A. Flansburg, with whom Mr. Eugene J. Plainer was on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. C. Petrus Peterson was on the brief for defendants in error.
Cited by 223 opinions | Published
Affirmed on the authority of Jones v. City of Portland, 245 U. S. 217, 224, 225; Green v. Frazier, 253 U. S. 233, 242.