Doucet v. Fontenot, 278 U.S. 561 (1928). · Go Syfert
Search
Doucet v. Fontenot, 278 U.S. 561 (1928). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doucet
v.
Fontenot, Sheriff
No. 113.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 22, 1928.
278 U.S. 561
Mr. Joseph George Medlenka for defendants in error in support of the motion.-, Mr. Harry P. Sneed for plaintiff in error in opposition thereto.
Published
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted for the reason that under § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February. 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937),. the case is not properly before this Court on writ of .error. There is, -however, a federal question, as shown by Wadkins v. Producers Oil Co., 227 U. S. 368, and McCune v. Essig, 199 U. S. 382. and the proper method o.f review would be by application for a writ of certiorari. Treating the writ of error aá an application for certiorari the same is denied.