green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
MORTGAGEE’S RIGHTS TO RECEIVE RENTS It is a long standing rule in the District of Columbia “that where the mortgagor is permitted to remain in possession of the property, he is entitled to receive the rents even after default and even though the land, when sold, should be insufficient to pay the debt.” Totten v. Harlowe, 90 F.2d 377, 380 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 711 , 57 S.Ct. 945 , 81 L.Ed. 1364 (1937); see also Hardee v. American Sec. & Trust Co., 77 F.2d 382 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 595 , 56 S.Ct. 110 , 80 L.Ed. 421 (1935); In re 1301 Connecticut Ave.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor (Brookland Garage). On Notice of Intent to Turn Over Possession of Brookland Garage Property
MORTGAGEE'S RIGHTS TO RECEIVE RENTS 23 It is a long standing rule in the District of Columbia "that where the mortgagor is permitted to remain in possession of the property, he is entitled to receive the rents even after default and even though the land, when sold, should be insufficient to pay the debt." Totten v. Harlowe, 90 F.2d 377, 380 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 711 , 57 S.Ct. 945 , 81 L.Ed. 1364 (1937); see also Hardee v. American Sec. & Trust Co., 77 F.2d 382 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 595 , 56 S.Ct. 110 , 80 L.Ed. 421 (1935); In re 1301 Connecticut Ave.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hardee, Receiver
v.
American Security & Trust Co.
v.
American Security & Trust Co.
No. 189.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1935.
Messrs. John F. Anderson, Huston Thompson, Herbert S. Ward, George P. Barse, and F. G. Await for petitioners., Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney, John S. Flannery, and G. Bowdoin Craighill for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.