green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United Yacht Brokers, Inc. v. Gillespie
Accord, Mayo v. Polk, 124 Fla. 534 , 169 So. 41 , appeal dismissed, 299 U.S. 507 , 57 S.Ct. 39 , 81 L.Ed. 376 (1936).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Westfield Insurance v. Paugh
Loving County v. Higginbotham, 115 S.W.2d 1110, 1121 (Tex.Civ.App.1938); see also Mayo v. Polk Co., 124 Fla. 534 , 169 So. 41, 43 (the rule that the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another, while generally a sound rule of statutory construction, has no application to the title of an act), appeal dismissed, 299 U.S. 507 , 57 S.Ct. 39 , 81 L.Ed. 376 (1936); 1A Singer, supra, § 18:4 (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Polk Company
v.
Mayo, Commissioner of Agriculture
v.
Mayo, Commissioner of Agriculture
No. 290.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1936.
Mr. George C. Bedell for appellant., Mr. Cary D. Landis, Attorney General of Florida, for appellee.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to amend the statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Payne v. Kansas, 248 U. S. 112; Arnold v. Hanna, 276 U. S. 591; cf. Sligh v. Kirkwood, 237 U. S. 52, 61, 62.