Connecticut Ry. & Lighting Co. v. Palmer, 305 U.S. 584 (1938). · Go Syfert
Search
Connecticut Ry. & Lighting Co. v. Palmer, 305 U.S. 584 (1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sharon Steel Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (nysd, 1981-05-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1938 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1938 1982 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Sharon Steel Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
S.D.N.Y. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Helvering v. Elkhorn Coal Co., 95 F.2d 732 (4th Cir.), aff’d on rehearing, 95 F.2d 737 (4th Cir. 1937), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 605 , 59 S.Ct. 65 , 83 L.Ed. 384 (1938).
cited Cited "see" In Re Lloyd, Carr and Company, Bankrupt (Two Cases). Appeal of Alan H. Abrahams. Appeal of United States of America
1st Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Van Camp Products Co., 95 F.2d 206, 209 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 605 , 59 S.Ct. 65 , 83 L.Ed. 384 (1938).
cited Cited "see" Utah Fuel Co. v. National Bituminous Coal Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1938 · signal: see · confidence high
See Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Coe, 68 App.D.C. 246 , 96 F.2d 518 , certiorari denied, 59 S.Ct. 65 , 83 L.Ed. —, and authorities there cited.
cited Cited "see, e.g." In Re Central Ice Cream Co.
Bankr. N.D. Ill. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Van Camp Products Co., 95 F.2d 206 (7th Cir.) cert. den. 305 U.S. 605 , 59 S.Ct. 65 , 83 L.Ed. 384 (1938); In re W.T.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.
v.
Palmer
No. 63.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1938.
305 U.S. 584
Mr. George W. Martin for petitioner., Messrs. James Garfield and Hermon J. Wells for respondents.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second[*585] Circuit granted.

Mr. George W. Martin for petitioner. Messrs. James Garfield and Hermon J. Wells for respondents. Mr. Justice Brandéis took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.