green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1938 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1938
1982
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Smsa Limited Partnership v. Federal Communications Commission, Leonard Communications, Inc., Intervenor
See 47 U.S.C. § 402 (c) (“appeal shall be taken ... within thirty days from the date upon which public notice is given of the decision or order complained of.”) Any person aggrieved by an FCC order may, however, petition the agency for reconsideration pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 405 (a), in lieu of immediate judicial review. “[T]he filing of a petition for rehearing ... ■will suspend the running of the period within which an appeal may be taken, and ... this period begins to run anew from the date on which final action is taken on the petition or motion, whether it be denied or granted.�…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Office Products of America, Inc.
See Matter of Hotel Governor Clinton, Inc., 96 F.2d 50 (2d Cir.), cert. den. sub now,., Canter v. Ramsey, 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 390 (1938). § 541 also provides that all proceeds from the sale of estate property are also estate property. 11 U.S.C. § 541 (a)(6).
discussed
Cited "see"
Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, Intervenors
(2×)
Joseph v. FCC, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 207 , 210, 404 F.2d 207 , 210 (1968); Gerico Investment Co. v. FCC, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 379, 380 , 240 F.2d 410 , 411 (1957); see Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 68 App.D.C. 282, 286, 96 F.2d 554, 558 , cert, denied, 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 391 (1938).
discussed
Cited "see"
Local 644, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
This is plainly inadequate, for the reviewing court “must have before it findings which are sufficiently definite to enable it to review intelligently the decision of the agency and ascertain if the facts on which it acted afforded a reasonable basis for its decision.” Sindicato Puertorriqueno De Trabajadores v. Hodgson, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 238, 245 , 448 F.2d 1161, 1168 (1971); see Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 68 App.D.C. 282, 287-89 , 96 F.2d 554, 559-61 , cert. denied, 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 391 (1938). .
cited
Cited "see"
Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
See Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 68 U.S.App.D.C. 282 , 287-289, 96 F.2d 654, 559-561 , cert. denied, Gross v. Saginaw Broadcasting Co., 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 391 (1938). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
These figures do not include AM and FM stations assigned to communities adjacent to Chicago.' 8 United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220 , 80 S.Ct. 282 , 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960) 9 E.g., United States v. Duncan, 310 F.2d 367 (7th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 938 , 83 S.Ct. 1542 , 10 L.Ed.2d 693 (1963); Blunt v. United States, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 266 , 244 F.2d 355 (1957); Boykin v. Huff, 73 App.D.C. 378 , 121 F.2d 865 (1941) 10 Gerico Investment Co. v. FCC, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 379, 380 , 240 F.2d 410 , 411 (1957); see Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 68 App.D.C. 282, 286 , 96 F.2d 554, 558 , cert. d…
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Gerico Investment Co. v. FCC, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 379, 380 , 240 F.2d 410 , 411 (1957); see Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 68 App.D.C. 282, 286 , 96 F.2d 554, 558 , cert. denied, 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 391 (1938). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Nebraska Department of Aeronautics v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Frontier Airlines, Inc., Intervenor
See, for example, Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Comn., 1938, 68 App.D.C. 282 , 96 F.2d 554, 559-61 , cert. den. 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 391 ; Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 216, 228 , 71 S.Ct. 264 , 95 L.Ed. 225 ; Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Relations Board, 1941, 313 U.S. 177, 197 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 ; American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1956, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 348 , 235 F.2d 845 , 853, cert. den. 353 U.S. 905 , 77 S.Ct. 668 , 1 L.Ed.2d 666 .
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Lea v. O'Lea
See Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 68 App.D.C. 282 , 96 F.2d 554 , certiorari denied Gross v. Saginaw Broadcasting Co., 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 391 ; Sibert v. Ellis, D.C.Mun.App., 108 A.2d 541 .
cited
Cited "see"
Gaddis v. Hongell
See Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Comm’n, 68 App.D.C. 282 , 96 F.2d 554 , certiorari denied Gross v. Saginaw Broadcasting Co., 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 391 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanders Bros. Radio Station v. Federal Communications Commission
See Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Comm., 68 App.D.C. 282, 287 , 96 F.2d 554, 559 , certiorari denied, 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 391 ; Missouri Broadcasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Comm., 68 App.D.C. 154, 156 , 94 F.2d 623, 625 , certiorari denied, 303 U.S. 655 , 58 S.Ct. 759 , 82 L.Ed. 1115 . 9 Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Comm., 68 App.D.C. 282 , 96 F.2d 554 , certiorari denied, 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. —; Missouri Broadcasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Comm., supra note 8; Tri-State Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
El Paso Electric Co. v. Public Utility Commission
(2×)
The comment to section 12 states that the drafters' intent was "to require the degree of explicitness imposed by decisions such as Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. FCC ... where the court required a statement of the `basic or underlying facts.'" Revised Model State Administrative Procedure Act § 12, 14 U.L.A. 419 (1961); see also Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Comm'n, 96 F.2d 554 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 391 (1938).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Federal Power Commission
See also Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 68 U.S.App.D.C. 282 , 96 F.2d 554, 559 , cert. denied, 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 391 (1938); In re United Corp., 249 F.2d 168, 179-180 (3rd Cir. 1957); Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, 143 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 444 F.2d 841, 850 (1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 923 , 91 S.Ct. 2229 , 2233, 29 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Democrat Printing Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
Compare findings in Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 68 App.D.C. 282, 290-291 , 96 F.2d 554, 562-563 , certiorari denied 1938, 305 U.S. 613 , 59 S.Ct. 72 , 83 L.Ed. 891 , with Tri-State Broadcasting Co., Station K.T.S.M. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1939, 71 App.D.C. 157, 158 , 107 F.2d 956, 957 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Steinthal
v.
Arlington Sample Book Co.
v.
Arlington Sample Book Co.
No. 122.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1938.
Mr. Harry Langsam for petitioner., Messrs. Daniel C. Donoghue and Walter T. Fahy for respondent.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.