A. M. Klemm & Son v. Winter Haven, 309 U.S. 638 (1940). · Go Syfert
Search
A. M. Klemm & Son v. Winter Haven, 309 U.S. 638 (1940). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
65 citation events across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (nysd, 1974-10-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1940 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1940 1983 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United States, 30 F.Supp. 968 (S.D.N.Y.1940), aff’d. 309 U.S. 638 , 69 S.Ct. 810 , 84 L.Ed. 993 . 2 .
discussed Cited "see" White v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. (2×)
9th Cir. · 1945 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acme Fast Freight v. United States, D.C., 30 F.Supp. 968 , affirmed 309 U.S. 638 , 60 S.Ct. 810 , 84 L.Ed. 993 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. Norman C. Brinke (2×)
5th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
Household Goods Carriers’ Bureau v. United States, N.D.Cal.1968, 288 F.Supp. 641, 642 , aff’d per curiam, 393 U.S. 265 , 89 S.Ct. 477 , 21 L.Ed.2d 426 ; see also Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United States, S.D.N.Y.1940, 30 F.Supp. 968, 969-971 , aff’d per curiam, 309 U.S. 638 , 60 S.Ct. 810 , 84 L.Ed. 993 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. United States
N.D. Ala. · 1951 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Acme Fast Freight, Inc., v. United States, 309 U.S. 638 , 60 S.Ot. 810, 84 L.Ed. 993 , affirming, per curiam, D.O.S.D.N.T., 1940, 30 F.Supp. 968 ; United States v. Rosenblum Truck Lines, 1942, 315 U.S. 50 , 62 S.Ot. 445, 86 L.Ed. 671 ; Thomson v. United States, 1944, 321 U.S. 19 , 64 S.Ot. 392, 88 L.Ed. 513 . 17 . 52 MOO 675 (1951), at page 679. ef: Dixie Ohio Exp.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
A. M. Klemm & Son
v.
Winter Haven
No. 823.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 8, 1940.
309 U.S. 638
Mr. Harvey C. Crittenden for appellant., Mr. Henry M. Sinclair for appellees.
Published
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Central Land Co v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112; Patterson v. Colorado, 205 U. S. 454, 460-461; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444, 450.