Cady v. Murphy, 311 U.S. 705 (1940). · Go Syfert
Search
Cady v. Murphy, 311 U.S. 705 (1940). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
56 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,273 E.B. Smith, Jr. v. American National Bank and Trust Company (ca6, 1992-12-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1942 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1942 1984 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,273 E.B. Smith, Jr. v. American National Bank and Trust Company
6th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cady v. Murphy, 113 F.2d 988, 990 (C.A. 1), (finding broker acting as agent of the owner liable as a statutory seller), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 705 [ 61 S.Ct. 175 , 85 L.Ed. 458 ] (1940).” It is not enough that the putative seller stands to benefit if the sale goes through; to be liable under a solicitation theory, he must have engaged in actual solicitation.
cited Cited "see" Ryder International Corp. v. First American National Bank
N.D. Ala. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cady v. Murphy, 113 F.2d 988, 990 (CA1) (finding broker acting as agent of the owner liable as a statutory seller), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 705 [ 61 S.Ct. 175 , 85 L.Ed. 458 ] (1940).
cited Cited "see" Kaufman v. Magid
D. Mass. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cady v. Murphy, 113 F.2d 988, 990-91 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 705 , 61 S.Ct. 175 , 85 L.Ed. 458 (1940).
discussed Cited "see" Mrs. Mae Hester Bohannon v. Manhattan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Jackson's Atlanta Ready Mix Concrete Company, Inc., Third-Party
3rd Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Independent Gasoline Co. v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, 190 Ga. 613 , 10 S.E.2d 58 , cert, denied, 311 U.S. 707 , 61 S.Ct. 175 , 85 L.Ed. 459 (1940); Green v. Atlanta Barbers’ Supply Co., 169 Ga. 805 , 151 S.E. 504 (1930); Scroggins v. Ridge Nassau Corp., 135 Ga.App. 547 , 218 S.E.2d 448 (1975); Griffin v. Burdine, 89 Ga.App. 391 , 79 S.E.2d 562 (1953); Branham v. Louisville & Nashville R.R.
discussed Cited "see" Katz v. Amos Treat & Co.
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murphy v. Cady, 30 F.Supp. 466, 469 (D.Me.1939), aff'd without consideration of the point, 113 F.2d 988 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 705 , 61 S.Ct. 175 , 85 L.Ed. 458 (1940); Boehm v. Granger, 181 Misc. 680 , 42 N.Y.S.2d 246 (Sup.Ct.N.Y.Co.1943), aff'd, 268 App.Div. 855 , 50 N.Y.S.2d 845 (1st Dept. 1944); 3 Loss, Securities Regulation 1713-15 (2d ed. 1961).
discussed Cited "see" Katz v. Amos Treat & Co.
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murphy v. Cady, 30 F.Supp. 466, 469 (D.Me.1939), aff’d without consideration of the point, 113 F.2d 988 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 705 , 61 S.Ct. 175 , 85 L.Ed. 458 (1940); Boehm v. Granger, 181 Misc. 680 , 42 N.Y.S.2d 246 (Sup.Ct.N.Y.Co.1943), aff’d, 268 App. Div. 855 , 50 N.Y.S.2d 845 (1st Dept. 1944); 3 Loss, Securities Regulation 1713-15 (2d ed. 1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Abelson v. Strong
D. Mass. · 1986 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Cady v. Murphy, 113 F.2d 988 (1st Cir.) (broker liable under § 12(2)), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 705 , 61 S.Ct. 175 , 85 L.Ed. 458 (1940), with Giordano v. Auditore, 355 Mass. 254 , 244 N.E.2d 555 (1969) (salesman liable under former M.G.L. c. 110A, § 18, precursor to § 410(a)(1)).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Holloway v. Howerdd
M.D. Tenn. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Murphy v. Cady, 30 F.Supp. 466 (S.D.Me.1939), aff’d. 113 F.2d 988 (1st Cir. 1940), cert. denied 311 U.S. 705 , 61 S.Ct. 175 , 85 L.Ed. 458 (1940); Schillner v. H.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cady
v.
Murphy
No. 526.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 25, 1940.
311 U.S. 705
Messrs. Richard Wait and Robert Hale for petitioners. Mr. Nathan W: Thompson for respondent.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

[*705] Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Mr. Justice Eouglas took no. part in the consideration and decision of this' application.