Pickett v. Union Terminal Co., 315 U.S. 830 (1942). · Go Syfert
Search
Pickett v. Union Terminal Co., 315 U.S. 830 (1942). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Gordy (ca11, 1991-04-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Gordy (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See D’Oench, 315 U.S. at 460 , 62 S.Ct. at 681 (requiring the note-maker to have “lent himself to a scheme or arrangement”).
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Morley
3rd Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See D'Oench, Duhme and Co. v. FDIC, 315 U.S. 447 , 62 S.Ct. 676 , 86 L.Ed. 956 , reh'g denied, 315 U.S. 830 , 62 S.Ct. 910 , 86 L.Ed. 1224 (1942) (after FDIC acquired a note under a purchase and assumption program, the Court concluded that a party could not use a defense premised on an undisclosed agreement against the FDIC).
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance v. Morley
11th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See D'Oench, Duhme and Co. v. FDIC, 315 U.S. 447 , 62 S.Ct. 676 , 86 L.Ed. 956 , reh'g denied, 315 U.S. 830 , 62 S.Ct. 910 , 86 L.Ed. 1224 (1942) (after FDIC acquired a note under a purchase and assumption program, the Court concluded that a party could not use a defense premised on an undisclosed agreement against the FDIC).
discussed Cited "see" NAT. CREDIT UNION ADMIN. BD. v. Metzler
E.D. Mo. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Justice Jackson's concurring opinion in D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. F.D.I.C., 315 U.S. 447, 471 , 62 S.Ct. 676, 686 , 86 L.Ed. 956 (1942), reh'g denied, 315 U.S. 830 , 62 S.Ct. 910 , 86 L.Ed. 1224 (1942). 5.
discussed Cited "see" National Credit Union Administration Board v. Metzler
E.D. Mo. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Justice Jackson’s concurring opinion in D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. F.D.I.C., 315 U.S. 447, 471 , 62 S.Ct. 676, 686 , 86 L.Ed. 956 (1942), reh’g denied, 315 U.S. 830 , 62 S.Ct. 910 , 86 L.Ed. 1224 (1942). 5.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Probber International Equities Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. F.D.I.C., 315 U.S. 447 , 62 S.Ct. 676 , 86 L.Ed. 956 , reh. denied, 315 U.S. 830 , 62 S.Ct. 910 , 86 L.Ed. 1224 (1942); Deitrick v. Greaney, 309 U.S. 190 , 60 S.Ct. 480 , 84 L.Ed. 694 , reh. denied, 309 U.S. 697 , 60 S.Ct. 611 , 84 L.Ed. 1036 (1940); Matter of Weis Securities, Inc., 605 F.2d 590 (2 Cir. 1978), cert. denied, sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pickett, General Chairman
v.
Union Terminal Co. Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co. and D'Oench, Duhme & Co., Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
No. 1023; No. 112; No. 206.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1942.
315 U.S. 830
Applications, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

Petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.