Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co. v. Crosley Corp., 317 U.S. 681 (1942). · Go Syfert
Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co. v. Crosley Corp., 317 U.S. 681 (1942). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“anticipatory suits are disfavored because they are aspects of forum-shopping”
46 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thomas v. Imperial Industrial Supply Company (hid, 2020-10-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1942 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1942 1984 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Thomas v. Imperial Industrial Supply Company
D. Haw. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
anticipatory suits are disfavored because they are aspects of forum-shopping
discussed Cited "see" Bamdad Mechanic Co. v. United Technologies Corp. (2×)
D. Del. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co., 130 F.2d 474, 475 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 681 , 63 S.Ct. 202 , 87 L.Ed. 546 (1942) (denying defendant’s motion to stay or dismiss); Crosley Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 122 F.2d 925, 929-30 (3d Cir.1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 813 , 62 S.Ct. 798 , 86 L.Ed. 1211 (1942) (directing trial court to grant plaintiff’s motion to enjoin defendant from prosecuting case elsewhere); Semmes Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 429 F.2d 1197 (2d Cir.1970) (enjoining plaintiff).
cited Cited "see" Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.
3rd Cir. · 1942 · signal: see · confidence high
See ___ U.S. ___, 63 S.Ct. 202 , 87 L.Ed. ___ .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.
v.
Crosley Corporation
No. 457.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1942.
317 U.S. 681
Mr. Victor S. Beam for petitioner. Messrs. Samuel E. Darby, Jr. and Floyd H. Crexos for respondent.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
Citer courts: D. Hawaii (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.