green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.1 score
“pending appeal, the judgment of a california superior court is not final and is not evidence of the rights therein declared.”
Treatment trajectory · 1944 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1944
1985
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Escondido West Travelodge
pending appeal, the judgment of a california superior court is not final and is not evidence of the rights therein declared.
cited
Cited "see"
North Valley Baptist Church v. McMahon
See Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 reh’g denied, 321 U.S. 804 , 64 S.Ct. 784 , 88 L.Ed. 1090 (1944); Rush v. Obledo, 756 F.2d 713 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re C.M., 07ap-933 (6-19-2008)
See, e.g., In re H.W. , 114 Ohio St.3d 65 , 2007-Ohio-2879 , at ¶ 9 (discussing legal rights of grandparents vis-à-vis grandchildren). 4 Cf. Troxell v. Granville (2000), 530 U.S. 57 , 65-66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054 , quoting Prince v. Massachusetts (1944), 321 U.S. 158 , 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , rehearing denied, 321 U.S. 804 , 64 S.Ct. 784 (stating that "`[i]t is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder'"). *Page 8 {¶ 15} "[T]o terminate pa…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Prince
v.
Massachusetts
v.
Massachusetts
No. 98.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 27, 1944.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. California (1)
No opinion found. Click here to view source material.