green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gluzman
See, e.g., United States v. Herrera, 584 F.2d 1137, 1147 (2d Cir.1978) (noting that the constitutionality of section 1952 has been repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged); United States v. Barrow, 363 F.2d 62 . (3d Cir.1966), ce rt. denied, 385 U.S. 1001 , 87 S.Ct. 703 , 17 L.Ed.2d 541 (1967); United States v. Zizzo, 338 F.2d 577 (7th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 915 , 85 S.Ct. 1530 , 14 L.Ed.2d 435 (1965); United States v. Goldberg, 928 F.Supp. 89, 94-98 (D.Mass.1996); see also Hemans v. United States, 163 F.2d 228 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 801 , 68 S.Ct. 100 , 92 L.Ed. 380 (1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Brown Instrument Co. v. Warner, 161 F.2d 910, 911 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 801 , 68 S.Ct. 101 , 92 L.Ed. 380 (1947); Taylor Instrument Companies v. Fawley-Brost Co., 139 F.2d 98, 100-01 (7th Cir.1943), cert. denied, 321 U.S. 785 , 64 S.Ct. 782 , 88 L.Ed. 1076 (1944). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Groseclose v. Dutton
See, e.g., Hemans v. United States, 163 F.2d 228, 237 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 332 U.S. 801 , 68 S.Ct. 100 , 92 L.Ed. 380 (1947).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Brooks
See, e.g, N.L.R.B. v. Swift & Co, 3 Cir, 162 F.2d 575 , certiorari denied 332 U.S. 791 , 68 S.Ct. 101 , 92 L.Ed. 373 ; N.L.R.B. v. S. H.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown Instrument Co.
v.
Warner, Register of Copyrights
v.
Warner, Register of Copyrights
No. 304.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1947.
Samuel E. Darby, Jr., C. B. Spangenberg and E. H. Parry, Jr. for petitioner., Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Ford, Paul A. Sweeney, Harry I. Rand and H. L. Godfrey for respondent., Albert I. Kegan and Esther 0. Kegan filed a brief for the Fawley-Brost Company, as amicus curiae, opposing the petition.
Cited by 30 opinions | Published
Certiorari denied.