green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1948 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1948
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
Bereslavsky v. Caffey, 2 Cir., 1947, 161 F.2d 499 , certiorari denied 332 U.S. 770 , 6S S.Ct. 82, 92 L.Ed. 355 ; Commercial Nat.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Leon Dotson, and Reginald Owens
See Young v. United States, 163 F.2d 187, 189-90 (10th Cir.) (rejecting defendants’ demands for a new trial but implicitly agreeing that appropriate remedy would be “to have the causes remanded in order that the district court may reform the verdicts so that they will correctly express the agreement actually reached by the jury but incorrectly expressed in the verdicts as returned into open court and then enter new judgments upon the corrected verdicts.”), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 770 , 68 S.Ct. 83 , 92 L.Ed. 355 (1947); Freid v. McGrath, 135 F.2d 833, 834 (D.C.Cir.1943) (“If the jury ac…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James L. Love
See Young v. United States, 163 F.2d 187, 189 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 770 , 68 S.Ct. 83 , 92 L.Ed. 355 (1947) and 334 U.S. 859 , 68 S.Ct. 1533 , 92 L.Ed. 1779 (1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
Local 783, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Aflcio v. General Electric Company
(2×)
See Bereslavsky v. Kloeb, 162 F.2d 862 (6th Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 816 , 68 S.Ct. 156 , 92 L.Ed. 393 (1947), Bereslavsky v. Caffey, 161 F.2d 499 (2d Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 770 , 68 S.Ct. 82 , 92 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See United States v. Brandenburg, 155 F.2d 110, 111 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 769 , 68 S. Ct. 80 , 92 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ingram v. Crouse
See Young v. United States, 163 F.2d 187 , (10th Cir. 1947), certiorari denied, 332 U.S. 770 , 68 S.Ct. 83 , 92 L.Ed. 355 ; Loney v. United States, 151 F.2d 1 (10th Cir. 1945); Johnson v. Hunter, 144 F.2d 565 (10th Cir. 1944).
discussed
Cited "see"
Irene Ethel Vinyard v. United States
See United States v. Brandenburg, 3 Cir., 1947, 162 F.2d 980, 981, 982 , cert. denied 1947, 332 U.S. 769 , 68 S. Ct. 80 [ 92 L.Ed. 354 ].” See, also, United States v. De Normand, 2 Cir., 1945, 149 F.2d 622, 624 .
cited
Cited "see"
Lay v. J. M. McDonald Co.
See Young v. United States, 10 Cir., 1947, 163 F.2d 187 , certiorari denied 332 U.S. 770 , 68 S.Ct. 83 , 92 L.Ed. 355 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Canister Co. v. Leahy, Chief Judge
See Bereslavsky v. Caffey, 2 Cir., 161 F.2d 499 , certiorari denied 332 U.S. 770 , 68 S.Ct. 82 , 92 L.Ed. 355 , and Bereslavsky v. Kloeb, 6 Cir., 162 F.2d 862 , certiorari denied 332 U.S. 816 , 68 S.Ct. 156 , 92 L.Ed. 393 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Holmes
See United States v. Brandenburg, 3 Cir., 1947, 162 F.2d 980, 981, 982 , cert. denied 1947, 332 U.S. 769 , 68 S.Ct. 80 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stewart Ex Rel. Stewart v. Rice
Berger, Weinstein's Evidence ¶ 606[4] at 606-32 (1982); see also Young v. United States, 163 F.2d 187 (10th Cir.1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 770 , 68 S.Ct. 83 , 92 L.Ed. 355 (1947).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Home Products Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson
See, e.g., Bereslavsky v. Caffey, 161 F.2d 499 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 770 , 68 S.Ct. 82 , 92 L.Ed. 355 (1947); Ross v. Plastic Playthings, Inc., 138 F.Supp. 887, 888-89 (S.D.N.Y.1956).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Flagstaff Foodservice Corp. v. Consolidated Foods Corp. (In re Flagstaff Foodservice Corp.)
See, e.g., Bereslavsky v. Caffey, 161 F.2d 499 (2d Cir.1947) cert. denied 332 U.S. 770 , 68 S.Ct. 82 , 92 L.Ed. 355 (1948).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Consumer Energy Council of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See also Watts v. United States, 161 F.2d 511, 513 (5th Cir.) (“A joint resolution of the House and Senate, when approved by the President, has the effect of law.”), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 769 , 68 S.Ct. 81 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Consumer Energy Council of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See also Watts v. United States, 161 F.2d 511, 513 (5th Cir.) (“A joint resolution of the House and Senate, when approved by the President, has the effect of law.”), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 769 , 68 S.Ct. 81 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cataldo v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Compare Bereslavsky v. Kloeb, 162 F.2d 862, 864 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 816 , 68 S.Ct. 156 , 92 L.Ed. 393 (1947), and Bereslavsky v. Caffey, 161 F.2d 499 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 770 , 68 S.Ct. 82 , 92 L.Ed. 355 (1947), and Munkacsy v. Warner Bros.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Artemus Burkeen, United States of America v. Harold Tucker Matlock
See, e. g., Danziger v. United States, 161 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 332 U.S. 769 , 68 S.Ct. 81 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Virgil D. Dardi, Robert B. Gravis, Charles Rosenthal and Charles Berman
See, e. g., Danziger v. United States, 161 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 769 , 68 S.Ct. 81 , 92 L.Ed. 354 (1947).
Bruce et ux.
v.
King
v.
King
No. 243.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1947.
Homer L. Bruce for petitioners., R. K. Hanger for respondent.
Published
Certiorari denied.